Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Primacy 4 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 23 + 0 road tests and 13,381 + 118 owner reviews. How we score

Primacy 4 is ahead, 79–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Primacy 4
Tire AMichelin

Primacy 4

Summer

Tests 83 · 23 tests Owners 74 · 13,381 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Well my answer is none of the above. You choose, they are all a lottery imo. I just bought some Michelin Primacy 4 for mine today. Size 215/55 R18”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 81

    Dry

    Primacy 4 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / – tests85≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7475

    Primacy 4: 60% × 85.3 + 40% × 73.9 = 81

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 81

    Wet

    Primacy 4 +20
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / – tests85≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7658

    Primacy 4: 60% × 84.9 + 40% × 76.2 = 81

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 76

    Comfort

    Primacy 4 +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests76≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7462

    Primacy 4: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 74.2 = 76

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests74–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Primacy 4: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Primacy 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 77

    Treadwear

    Primacy 4 +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests82≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7159

    Primacy 4: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 70.6 = 77

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 74

    Handling (owners)

    Primacy 4 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePrimacy 4Parada Spec-2
    Reviews found online7469
Scores at a glance
Michelin Primacy 4 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Primacy 4Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Relative Score 79 66
Dry 81 73
Wet 81 61
Comfort 76 65
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 77 62
Handling (owners) 74 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Primacy 4

Parada Spec-2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPrimacy 4Parada Spec-2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 #8/8 2013 Auto Bild Performance Summer Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Primacy 4

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
  • Low road noise and a very quiet, comfortable ride
  • Reliable and consistent wet and dry grip

Cons

  • Vague, numb, or floaty steering feel with soft sidewalls under hard cornering
  • High price point compared to competitors
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise or harsher ride as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Primacy 4 review

Tire B Parada Spec-2

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
  • Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Primacy 4

Positive

Community sentiment towards the Michelin Primacy 4 is generally positive, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfort, and dependable wet and dry braking performance. Several owners note impressive longevity reaching over 50,000 to 70,000 km, though some EV and SUV drivers report accelerated wear and fragile sidewalls over rough terrain. It is commonly viewed as a premium touring tire that commands high prices compared to competitors.

Top themes
#tread life and longevity#cabin noise and comfort#wet and dry grip#comparisons with Pilot Sport#EV tire performance#sidewall damage and punctures#premium pricing

Based on 44 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Primacy 4 B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available57—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Primacy 4

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 77 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 76 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin Primacy 4
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Primacy 4 or Parada Spec-2?

Which is better in the wet, Primacy 4 or Parada Spec-2?

Michelin Primacy 4, 81 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Primacy 4 or Parada Spec-2?

Michelin Primacy 4, 81 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Primacy 4 or Parada Spec-2?

Michelin Primacy 4, 76 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Primacy 4 or Parada Spec-2?

Michelin Primacy 4, 77 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology