tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Michelin X Ice Snow vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 2 road tests and 20 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

X Ice Snow is ahead, 72–67

Check price on Amazon · X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin X Ice Snow
Tire AMichelin

X Ice Snow

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 20 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (comfort (tester's mark))

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01
Tire BNokian

Hakkapeliitta 01

Winter tire

± 9

Tests 66 · 2 tests Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test (noise (tester's mark))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    X Ice Snow +13
    54
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 1 tests6550
    Reviews found online71≈ 61 (est.)

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 70.7 = 67

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 50.1 + 40% × 60.6 (est.) = 54

    No owner ratings of dry for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 2 tests6571
    Reviews found online79≈ 71 (est.)

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 79.2 = 71

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 70.6 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of wet for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 76

    Snow

    X Ice Snow +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 1 tests7377
    Reviews found online81≈ 72 (est.)

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 81.1 = 76

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 72.5 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of snow for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 80

    Comfort

    X Ice Snow +18
    62
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests8156
    Reviews found online79≈ 66 (est.)

    X Ice Snow: 40% × 81 + 60% × 78.8 = 80

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 40% × 56.1 + 60% × 66.1 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of comfort for Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 75

    Noise

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 1 tests8181
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75

    Hakkapeliitta 01: 60% × 81.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75

    No owner ratings of noise for X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online81–

    X Ice Snow: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76

    No road tests of treadwear for X Ice Snow. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Reviews found online75–
  8. 77

    Efficiency

    X Ice Snow +25
    52
    Why this score
    SourceX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests7752
Scores at a glance
CategoryMichelin X Ice SnowNokian Hakkapeliitta 01
Relative Score 72 67
Dry 67 54
Wet 71 71
Snow 76 75
Comfort 80 62
Noise 75 75
Treadwear 76 –
Handling (owners) 75 –
Efficiency 77 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

X Ice Snow

± 9

Hakkapeliitta 01

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryX Ice SnowHakkapeliitta 01ΔHead-to-head
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 78% #5/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test 40% #7/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 75% #3/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 76% #18/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #6/14 · 2025 Friction and Studded Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% #3/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 50% #15/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling Snow 95% #5/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 100% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Handling (tester's mark) Snow 60% #11/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test 90% #12/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Ice Traction Snow 99% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 81% #2/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 86% #8/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 56% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 100% #12/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 96% #6/7 · 2025 NAF Motor Studless Winter Tire Test R17 96% #6/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 97% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 40% #16/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 99% #7/8 · 2024 Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise (tester's mark) Noise 88% #9/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 100% #1/20 · 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test 92% #17/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Road Rating (tester's mark) Other 97% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test 30% #17/18 · 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test #1/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A X Ice Snow

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, packed snow, and slush
  • High confidence and predictable handling on icy and freezing roads
  • Impressive tread wear longevity and minimal wear over multiple seasons

Cons

  • Average performance on dry and wet pavement compared to dedicated non-winter tires
  • Slightly noisier on dry pavement as the tread wears down
  • Can feel slightly twitchy at the limit or less comfortable than older X-Ice generations
All owner themes in the X Ice Snow review

Tire B Hakkapeliitta 01

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin X Ice Snow B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01
CategoryWinterWinter tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10090
Rim diameters13″ – 21″14″ – 22″
Tread depth—11.5/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common4242

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin X Ice Snow

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01

Winner: Michelin X Ice Snow — better efficiency, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 77 vs 52 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 80 vs 62 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin X Ice Snow scores 67 vs 54 on dry.

Tire A · Michelin X Ice Snow
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nokian Hakkapeliitta 01
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Which is better in the wet, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 67 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 80 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which rolls more easily, X Ice Snow or Hakkapeliitta 01?

Michelin X Ice Snow, 77 vs 52 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology