Tests 73 · 11 tests Owners 68 · 33 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wear)
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Blue 4 Season vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 11 + 18 road tests and 33 + 1,596 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac is ahead, 80–71
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 1,596 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)
“Vredestein Quatrac and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are good tyres. I prefer the vredestein quite comfortable tyres and quieter than the Hankook. But you can't go wrong with either of them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
Key facts
- In 4 tests that measured dry braking for both, N Blue 4 Season won 0 and Quatrac won 4 (average 93% vs 97% of the best).
- In 4 tests that measured wet braking for both, N Blue 4 Season won 0 and Quatrac won 4 (average 86% vs 96% of the best).
-
68
Dry
Quatrac +1381Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 18 tests 70 83 Reviews found online 65 78 Dry Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–4 93% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 98% 100% N Blue 4 Season: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 65.1 = 68
Quatrac: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 77.7 = 81
-
74
Wet
Quatrac +1791Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 18 tests 74 95 Reviews found online 74 85 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 95% 98% Wet Braking (% of best) · 4 shared tests · wins 0–4 86% 96% Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 96% 100% N Blue 4 Season: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 73.9 = 74
Quatrac: 60% × 94.7 + 40% × 85.4 = 91
-
67
Snow
Quatrac +774Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 13 tests 67 74 Reviews found online 68 73 Snow Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 92% 95% Snow Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–1 96% 96% Snow Traction (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 92% 93% N Blue 4 Season: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 68.4 = 67
Quatrac: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 73 = 74
-
70
Comfort
Quatrac +474Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 70 74 N Blue 4 Season: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 70
Quatrac: 40% × 74.4 + 60% × 73.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for N Blue 4 Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
76
Noise
N Blue 4 Season +373Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 13 tests 83 78 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 99% 99% N Blue 4 Season: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76
Quatrac: 60% × 78 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
71
Treadwear
Quatrac +475Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests 76 73 Reviews found online 63 77 Abrasion (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 100% 82% Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–1 90% 82% N Blue 4 Season: 60% × 76.2 + 40% × 62.8 = 71
Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 77 = 75
-
71
Handling (owners)
Quatrac +576Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Reviews found online 71 76 -
27
Efficiency
Quatrac +4673Why this score
Source N Blue 4 Season Quatrac Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 13 tests 27 73 Fuel Consumption (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 95% 96% Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–2 79% 89%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Blue 4 Season | Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 80 |
| Dry | 68 | 81 |
| Wet | 74 | 91 |
| Snow | 67 | 74 |
| Comfort | 70 | 74 |
| Noise | 76 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 76 |
| Efficiency | 27 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
N Blue 4 Season
80
/ 100
Quatrac
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Nexen N Blue 4 Season finished ahead 0 times and Vredestein Quatrac 4 times.
| Discipline | Category | N Blue 4 Season | Quatrac | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% | 97% | −3.7 | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 100% | −1.8 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 98% | −2.8 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 86% | 96% | −10.2 | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 100% | −4.0 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% | 95% | −2.2 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% | 96% | −0.8 | 0–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 92% | 93% | −1.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Noise | Noise | 99% | 99% | +0.3 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 100% | 82% | +17.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Wear | Treadwear | 90% | 82% | +7.9 | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 95% | 96% | −0.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 79% | 89% | −9.7 | 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 100% | 77% | +23.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #6/15 | #8/15 | – | 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Value | Cost | 100% | 67% | +33.2 | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test · 195/55 R16 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #14/35 | #2/35 | – | 0–4 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2022 All Season Tyre Market Overview · 195/55 R16 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Blue 4 Season
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong grip and predictable handling in cold, wet, and snowy winter conditions
Cons
- Vague road feedback and noticeable understeer in warmer weather (above 20°C)
- Increased rolling resistance leading to slightly reduced fuel economy
- Softer sidewalls limit spirited or high-speed dry cornering performance
Tire B Quatrac
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces
Cons
- Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
- Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
- Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Vredestein Quatrac
Community sentiment toward the Vredestein Quatrac is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers viewing it as one of the best mid-range all-weather tires available. Users frequently praise its reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions, along with its quiet and comfortable ride compared to rivals. While some owners note that stopping distances on ice or deep snow do not match dedicated winter tires and tread wear can vary, most consider it an exceptional value over premium brands like Michelin.
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-01-23
“My wife has been using Vredestein Quatracs for 4 years now. She has done 60,000 km so far (mostly commuting and school runs, but also several longer trips). The tyres still have plenty od tread. During this winter they will reach the winter indicators and they will definitely last through the next summer, so it will be more than 4.5 years and approximately 70,000 km. So far, they have been very good, quiet, very grippy in the wet and fine even in the occasional snow. The car is a small crossover - Opel Mokka, so pretty different to your 325i :) I can definitely recommend them!”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2019-02-01
“The last week or so here we have received about 12-15 inches of snow. I have these on my 2003 Forester and must say they dig through the snow very well. The only thing that I have found is that they seem a little slick when stopping. Don't stop as well as the Blizzaks on the wife's Galant, but then again they are not a dedicated winter tire either. Have put about 3500 miles on them since July and must say for an all season tire they have performed well in all conditions.”
alltrac.net
·2025-04-09
“I agree with all of that. The Vredesteins are good, at least the set I have was. I’ll give them another shot at $600. If the sidewalls are a bit fragile to get that lightness, I suppose that’s something to keep in mind. Most people just don’t think about their car and don’t want to. They just want to go to work and get home after work. People have weird expectations of their tires. Whether this is a joke or not it might as well be a genuine review because certainly there’s someone out there for whom this is true.”
Top themes
#mid-range tire value#snow and winter performance#wet weather traction#quiet and comfortable ride#tread life longevity#all-weather capability
Based on 34 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Blue 4 Season | B · Vredestein Quatrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 56 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 19″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | — | 180 A B |
| Sizes in common | 22 | 22 |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Nexen N Blue 4 Season
80
/ 100
Vredestein Quatrac
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better efficiency, wet and dry. Pick the Nexen N Blue 4 Season if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Vredestein Quatrac scores 73 vs 27 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Quatrac scores 91 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Vredestein Quatrac scores 74 vs 67 on snow.
Tire A · Nexen N Blue 4 Season
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Which is better in the wet, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 91 vs 74 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Nexen N Blue 4 Season, 76 vs 73 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 71 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, N Blue 4 Season or Quatrac?
Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 27 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology