tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Blue ECO vs Nexen N Fera AU5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–57

Check price on Amazon · N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire ANexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews

Nexen N Fera AU5
Tire BNexen

N Fera AU5

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    N Blue ECO +12
    54
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECON Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6646

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 54

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +13
    56
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECON Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6950

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 56

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Comfort

    N Blue ECO +1
    65
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECON Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6362

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 60

    Treadwear

    N Fera AU5 +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECON Fera AU5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5662

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    N Fera AU5: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N Fera AU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 66

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue ECO +12
    54
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECON Fera AU5
    Reviews found online6654
Scores at a glance
CategoryNexen N Blue ECONexen N Fera AU5
Relative Score 66 57
Dry 66 54
Wet 69 56
Comfort 66 65
Treadwear 60 64
Handling (owners) 66 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

N Blue ECO

N Fera AU5

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Tire B N Fera AU5

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity, lasting multiple years of daily commuting
  • Very quiet and comfortable ride quality with smooth highway manners
  • Soft sidewalls contribute to high comfort levels even at higher tire pressures

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls lead to noticeable flex and reduced responsiveness in hard cornering
  • Lower dry grip levels compared to more aggressive performance tires like the Nexen N Fera SU1
  • Potential for traction loss or wheel spin during wet weather take-offs, particularly on powerful rear-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the N Fera AU5 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Blue ECO B · Nexen N Fera AU5
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available24—
Rim diameters13″ – 16″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Blue ECO

Nexen N Fera AU5

Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Nexen N Fera AU5 if treadwear matters most to you. Nexen N Fera AU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nexen N Fera AU5 scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Nexen N Blue ECO
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera AU5
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5?

Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or N Fera AU5?

Nexen N Fera AU5, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology