Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Blue ECO vs Toyo NanoEnergy 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire ANexen

N Blue ECO

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews

Toyo NanoEnergy 2
Tire BToyo

NanoEnergy 2

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    N Blue ECO +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECONanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6653

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 59

    No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 69

    Wet

    N Blue ECO +16
    53
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECONanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6947

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 53

    No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Comfort

    N Blue ECO +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECONanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6354

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 60

    Treadwear

    Level
    60
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECONanoEnergy 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5656

    N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60

    NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 66

    Handling (owners)

    N Blue ECO +11
    55
    Why this score
    SourceN Blue ECONanoEnergy 2
    Reviews found online6655
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Blue ECO vs Toyo NanoEnergy 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Blue ECOToyo NanoEnergy 2
Relative Score 66 57
Dry 66 59
Wet 69 53
Comfort 66 62
Treadwear 60 60
Handling (owners) 66 55

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

N Blue ECO

NanoEnergy 2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryN Blue ECONanoEnergy 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test #50/50 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Blue ECO

Pros

  • Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
  • Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
  • Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
  • Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
  • Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
All owner themes in the N Blue ECO review

Tire B NanoEnergy 2

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort
  • Satisfactory dry-road grip for casual driving
  • Low noise levels

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
  • Tendency to squeal during cornering
  • Inconsistent handling compared to premium factory-fitted alternatives
All owner themes in the NanoEnergy 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Blue ECO B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available24—
Rim diameters13″ – 16″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Blue ECO

Toyo NanoEnergy 2

Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Nexen N Blue ECO
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?

Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 53 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?

Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology