Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 36 reviews
Nexen N Blue ECO vs Toyo NanoEnergy 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 36 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
N Blue ECO is ahead, 66–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
N Blue ECO +759Why this score
Source N Blue ECO NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 66 53 N Blue ECO: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 59
No road tests of dry for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
69
Wet
N Blue ECO +1653Why this score
Source N Blue ECO NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 69 47 N Blue ECO: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 69
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 53
No road tests of wet for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
66
Comfort
N Blue ECO +462Why this score
Source N Blue ECO NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 54 N Blue ECO: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.4 = 62
No road tests of comfort for N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
Level60Why this score
Source N Blue ECO NanoEnergy 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 56 56 N Blue ECO: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 60
NanoEnergy 2: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for N Blue ECO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
66
Handling (owners)
N Blue ECO +1155Why this score
Source N Blue ECO NanoEnergy 2 Reviews found online 66 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Blue ECO | Toyo NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 57 |
| Dry | 66 | 59 |
| Wet | 69 | 53 |
| Comfort | 66 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 66 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
N Blue ECO
NanoEnergy 2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | N Blue ECO | NanoEnergy 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #15/16 2013 ACE Summer Touring Tyre Test | #50/50 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Blue ECO
Pros
- Excellent value for money and budget-friendly purchase price
- Strong grip and handling in both wet and dry conditions
- Good ride comfort and relatively low road noise
Cons
- Rapid or uneven tread wear reported by several users
- Premature rubber cracking and perishing observed over time
- Polarizing opinions on wet weather traction and braking distance
Tire B NanoEnergy 2
Pros
- High level of ride comfort
- Satisfactory dry-road grip for casual driving
- Low noise levels
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- Tendency to squeal during cornering
- Inconsistent handling compared to premium factory-fitted alternatives
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Blue ECO | B · Toyo NanoEnergy 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 16″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N Blue ECO
Toyo NanoEnergy 2
Winner: Nexen N Blue ECO — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo NanoEnergy 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 69 vs 53 on wet.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 55 on handling.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 59 on dry.
Nexen N Blue ECO scores 66 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?
Which is better in the wet, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 69 vs 53 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?
Nexen N Blue ECO, 66 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Blue ECO or NanoEnergy 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 60 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology