Tests 62 · 7 tests Owners 79 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera Primus vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 7 + 20 road tests and 11 + 18 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: N Fera Primus 69, N Fera Sport SU2 68.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 20 tests Owners 55 · 18 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
N Fera Primus +372Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 18 tests 73 81 Reviews found online 78 59 N Fera Primus: 60% × 73.3 + 40% × 77.8 = 75
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 80.6 + 40% × 59.1 = 72
-
85
Wet
N Fera Primus +976Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 19 tests 86 84 Reviews found online 84 64 N Fera Primus: 60% × 86.3 + 40% × 83.5 = 85
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 84.1 + 40% × 64.4 = 76
-
57
Comfort
N Fera Sport SU2 +966Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests 32 89 Reviews found online 74 51 N Fera Primus: 40% × 32.2 + 60% × 73.8 = 57
N Fera Sport SU2: 40% × 89.1 + 60% × 50.6 = 66
-
65
Noise
N Fera Sport SU2 +1883Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 14 tests 64 95 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) N Fera Primus: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 65
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 83
No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
50
Treadwear
N Fera Sport SU2 +454Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 6 tests 33 63 Reviews found online 77 41 N Fera Primus: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 76.8 = 50
N Fera Sport SU2: 60% × 63 + 40% × 40.8 = 54
-
75
Handling (owners)
N Fera Primus +1461Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Reviews found online 75 61 -
54
Efficiency
N Fera Primus +747Why this score
Source N Fera Primus N Fera Sport SU2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 13 tests 54 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera Primus | Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 68 |
| Dry | 75 | 72 |
| Wet | 85 | 76 |
| Comfort | 57 | 66 |
| Noise | 65 | 83 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 61 |
| Efficiency | 54 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
N Fera Primus
68
/ 100
N Fera Sport SU2
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | N Fera Primus | N Fera Sport SU2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #17/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 97% #3/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #16/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #16/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 60% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | 91% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 91% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 86% #11/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | 98% #6/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #7/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview | 93% #3/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking (concrete) | Wet | 86% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 89% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 98% #5/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | 97% #15/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 40% #9/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #13/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 97% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Treadwear | 65% #10/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 65% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 59% #11/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 75% #14/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Efficiency | 94% #7/10 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | 95% #14/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 87% #17/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 83% #10/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 75% #6/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 96% #2/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #19/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | #5/20 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 57% #11/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 91% #4/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/10 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test | #10/10 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera Primus
Pros
- Fantastic dry and wet grip with stable cornering and predictable handling
- High level of comfort with a smooth, soft ride that absorbs bumps well
- Noticeably quieter than certain premium alternatives
Cons
- Slightly longer braking distances compared to some competing brands like Falken
- Reports of faster tread wear and relatively low initial tread depth
- Can be noisy for some drivers depending on the vehicle and road conditions
Tire B N Fera Sport SU2
Pros
- Significantly cheaper than premium tier alternatives like Michelin and Continental
- Impressive dry grip and predictable, controllable handling
- Strong wet weather performance and high-speed stability
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, often requiring replacement prematurely
- Stiff carcass leading to mediocre ride comfort and harshness over road imperfections
- Soft rubber compound prone to squirming under hard cornering or experiencing shoulder damage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera Primus | B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 50 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Nexen N Fera Primus
68
/ 100
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
Too close to call: Nexen N Fera Primus and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera Primus is stronger on handling, wet and efficiency. Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is stronger on noise, comfort and treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 83 vs 65 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 75 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera Primus scores 85 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scores 66 vs 57 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera Primus
Tire B · Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 85 vs 76 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 83 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 66 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, 54 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, N Fera Primus or N Fera Sport SU2?
Nexen N Fera Primus, 54 vs 47 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology