Head-to-head Updated

Nexen N Fera Primus vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 7 + 0 road tests and 11 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: N Fera Primus 70, Proxes CF1 69.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera Primus
Tire ANexen

N Fera Primus

Summer

Tests 61 · 7 tests Owners 77 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Vi Bilagare Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire BToyo

Proxes CF1

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    N Fera Primus +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera PrimusProxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests73≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7670

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 76.2 = 74

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 84

    Wet

    N Fera Primus +12
    72
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera PrimusProxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / – tests85≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8272

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 85.2 + 40% × 82 = 84

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 48

    Comfort

    Proxes CF1 +21
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera PrimusProxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests32≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7169

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 32.2 + 40% × 71.3 = 48

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 65

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera PrimusProxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests64–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 65

    No owner ratings of noise for N Fera Primus. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 49

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF1 +13
    62
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera PrimusProxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests33≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7460

    N Fera Primus: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 73.6 = 49

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 75

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera Primus +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceN Fera PrimusProxes CF1
    Reviews found online7569
Scores at a glance
Nexen N Fera Primus vs Toyo Proxes CF1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N Fera PrimusToyo Proxes CF1
Relative Score 70 69
Dry 74 69
Wet 84 72
Comfort 48 69
Noise 65 –
Treadwear 49 62
Handling (owners) 75 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

N Fera Primus

Proxes CF1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A N Fera Primus

Pros

  • Fantastic dry and wet grip with stable cornering and predictable handling
  • High level of comfort with a smooth, soft ride that absorbs bumps well
  • Noticeably quieter than certain premium alternatives

Cons

  • Slightly longer braking distances compared to some competing brands like Falken
  • Reports of faster tread wear and relatively low initial tread depth
  • Can be noisy for some drivers depending on the vehicle and road conditions
All owner themes in the N Fera Primus review

Tire B Proxes CF1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
  • Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
All owner themes in the Proxes CF1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N Fera Primus B · Toyo Proxes CF1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available50—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen N Fera Primus

Toyo Proxes CF1

Too close to call: Nexen N Fera Primus and Toyo Proxes CF1 are within 2 points overall. Nexen N Fera Primus is stronger on wet, handling and dry. Toyo Proxes CF1 is stronger on comfort and treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 48 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 62 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera Primus scores 84 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera Primus scores 75 vs 69 on handling.

Tire A · Nexen N Fera Primus
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

N Fera Primus or Proxes CF1?

Which is better in the wet, N Fera Primus or Proxes CF1?

Nexen N Fera Primus, 84 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera Primus or Proxes CF1?

Nexen N Fera Primus, 74 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, N Fera Primus or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 48 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, N Fera Primus or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 62 vs 49 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology