Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N'Fera RU1 vs Toyo Proxes Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 20 road tests and 28 + 1,277 owner reviews. How we score
N'Fera RU1 is ahead, 65–57
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 58 · 20 tests Owners 53 · 1,277 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Had the older version on an SRT8. Grip & performance were great. But wear was not. 10K miles(2 rotations) is all I got.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Proxes Sport +362Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 18 tests 54 61 Reviews found online 66 64 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 93% 92% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 98% 99% N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 65.9 = 59
Proxes Sport: 60% × 60.6 + 40% × 63.6 = 62
-
68
Wet
Proxes Sport +169Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 18 tests 67 76 Reviews found online 70 59 Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 95% 99% Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 90% 89% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 98% 98% N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67 + 40% × 70.3 = 68
Proxes Sport: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 59 = 69
-
67
Snow
N'Fera RU1 +3235Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 51 (est.) Reviews found online 65 10 N'Fera RU1: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
Proxes Sport: 60% × 51.3 (est.) + 40% × 10 = 35
No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Proxes Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
N'Fera RU1 +1055Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 49 Reviews found online 63 59 N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63 = 65
Proxes Sport: 40% × 49.4 + 60% × 58.6 = 55
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
Proxes Sport +370Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests 67 72 Reviews found online 68 68 Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 97% 98% N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.7 = 67
Proxes Sport: 60% × 72 + 40% × 68 = 70
-
67
Treadwear
N'Fera RU1 +2344Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 37 Reviews found online 67 54 N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
Proxes Sport: 60% × 37.1 + 40% × 54.3 = 44
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
65
Handling (owners)
N'Fera RU1 +1055Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Reviews found online 65 55 -
52
Efficiency
N'Fera RU1 +1141Why this score
Source N'Fera RU1 Proxes Sport Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 12 tests 52 41 Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 74% 82%
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N'Fera RU1 | Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 57 |
| Dry | 59 | 62 |
| Wet | 68 | 69 |
| Snow | 67 | 35 |
| Comfort | 65 | 55 |
| Noise | 67 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 44 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 55 |
| Efficiency | 52 | 41 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
N'Fera RU1
57
/ 100
Proxes Sport
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Nexen N'Fera RU1 finished ahead 0 times and Toyo Proxes Sport 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | N'Fera RU1 | Proxes Sport | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% | 92% | +1.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 99% | −0.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 95% | 99% | −4.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% | 89% | +0.5 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% | 98% | −0.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Noise | Noise | 97% | 98% | −0.9 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 74% | 82% | −8.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 77% | 72% | +5.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 91% | 89% | +2.0 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 97% | 100% | −3.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 97% | 93% | +3.6 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 88% | 88% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/10 | #7/10 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test · 225/55 R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N'Fera RU1
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
- High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
- Low road noise and quiet highway cruising
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
- Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
- Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
Tire B Proxes Sport
Pros
- Significantly more affordable than premium tier summer tires while offering around 80-90% of the performance
- Commendable grip and handling in dry conditions with a progressive, predictable breakaway
- Low road noise and generally high ride comfort compared to factory run-flats or older performance tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, with multiple users reporting replacement necessary between 6,000 and 12,000 miles
- Inconsistent or slippery wet-weather traction and occasional tendency to hydroplane in heavy standing water
- Stiff sidewalls on certain sizes leading to a harsher ride quality or increased noise for some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Nexen N'Fera RU1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Toyo Proxes Sport
Community sentiment toward the Toyo Proxes Sport family is generally positive, with users praising its value for money, comfortable ride quality, and capable daily street performance. While drivers note it lacks the sharp turn-in and grip of dedicated 200tw track tires, it is frequently highlighted as a cost-effective alternative to Michelin and Continental. Many prospective buyers note a relative scarcity of reviews, but those who run them report good traction, low noise, and appealing wide fitment options.
r/tires
·2 upvotes ·2026-08-09
“I have real world experience with the Toyo Proxes Sport AS+. This may be the best all around tire on the planet IMO. I'm old and so I've tried multiple tires in real world conditions as a daily driver with performance in mind. I know every Michelin and Pirelli. I've become an expert on available tires in the USA.. What you will find with This tire: * They are immediately quiet *Resist hydroplaning in big water * Higher than expected dry performance in super hot weather for an AS * Maintain tread pattern to the death and remain quiet. These tires are next level.”
forum.miata.net
“I own both the Falken and Toyo Proxes Sport, both in 235/40-17. The Toyo rides better, the Falken goes faster through the turns, and turn-in response is much quicker. I have not bothered to take the Toyo to the track because around our fun canyon roads it is clearly slower and with less grip than the Falken. The Falken feels like a race tire, complete with stiff sidewall support for crisp turn-in, used those for track and autocross over the last few months, including two wins in class at autocross. The Toyo feels like a street tire, much like the Continental ECS, complete with much lower weight because sidewalls are comparatively soft and squishy next to the Falken. If you want a soft daily driver 235/40 and you accept it is a few clicks slower than the Falken, the Toyo is great as a daily driver. But if you expect that Toyo to keep up with the Falken on track days, you will be disappointed.”
r/TyreReviews
·17 upvotes ·2026-08-27
“Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Really enjoyed these Proxes Sport 2s on my Alpina over the last year - in fact they’re so good I’ve put them on the B3 too! Great value for money. Read more”
Top themes
#value for money#street ride comfort#track performance comparison#wide sizing fitment#low user review availability#daily driving performance#wet and dry grip
Based on 32 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N'Fera RU1 | B · Toyo Proxes Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 83 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 A A | 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Nexen N'Fera RU1
57
/ 100
Toyo Proxes Sport
Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU1 — better snow, treadwear and efficiency. Pick the Toyo Proxes Sport if dry and noise matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 67 vs 35 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 67 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want lower fuel or energy use
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 52 vs 41 on efficiency.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 55 on comfort.
Tire A · Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire B · Toyo Proxes Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Which is better in the wet, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Toyo Proxes Sport, 62 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 67 vs 35 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Toyo Proxes Sport, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 67 vs 44 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, N'Fera RU1 or Proxes Sport?
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 52 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology