Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 46 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 75–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
N Fera SU4 +769Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 80 70 N Fera SU4: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 76
Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
N Fera SU4 +572Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 80 72 N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
73
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +469Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 77 69 N Fera SU4: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 73
Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +662Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 70 60 N Fera SU4: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +769Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Proxes CF1 Reviews found online 76 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 69 |
| Dry | 76 | 69 |
| Wet | 77 | 72 |
| Comfort | 73 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
N Fera SU4
69
/ 100
Proxes CF1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Nexen N Fera SU4
69
/ 100
Toyo Proxes CF1
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 68 vs 62 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 77 vs 72 on wet.
Tire A · Nexen N Fera SU4
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF1
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or Proxes CF1?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or Proxes CF1?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 77 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or Proxes CF1?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 76 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or Proxes CF1?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or Proxes CF1?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 68 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology