Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Nexen N Fera SU4 vs Vredestein Quatrac 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 80 + 58 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 75–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 58 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
N Fera SU4 +868Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Quatrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 80 69 N Fera SU4: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 76
Quatrac 3: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.6 = 68
No road tests of dry for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
N Fera SU4 +275Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Quatrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 80 78 N Fera SU4: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.9 = 77
Quatrac 3: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 75
No road tests of wet for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison76Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Quatrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 80 Quatrac 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.1 = 76
No road tests of snow for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
73
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +469Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Quatrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 77 69 N Fera SU4: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 73
Quatrac 3: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 69
No road tests of comfort for N Fera SU4 or Quatrac 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +266Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Quatrac 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 66 N Fera SU4: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
Quatrac 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for N Fera SU4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
76
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU4 +571Why this score
Source N Fera SU4 Quatrac 3 Reviews found online 76 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N Fera SU4 | Vredestein Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 68 |
| Wet | 77 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | 73 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N Fera SU4
Quatrac 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Tire B Quatrac 3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in snow, ice, and slush
- Strong wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Predictable and progressive handling limits
Cons
- Develops significant road noise or rhythmic droning as tread wears down
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, particularly on heavier vehicles
- Slightly reduced dry-pavement grip and sharper cornering response compared to dedicated summer tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N Fera SU4 | B · Vredestein Quatrac 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N Fera SU4
Vredestein Quatrac 3
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 68 on dry.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 73 vs 69 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N Fera SU4 or Quatrac 3?
Which is better in the wet, N Fera SU4 or Quatrac 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, N Fera SU4 or Quatrac 3?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N Fera SU4 or Quatrac 3?
Nexen N Fera SU4, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N Fera SU4 or Quatrac 3?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology