Head-to-head Updated

Nokian Outpost nAT vs Sumitomo Encounter AT2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 36 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Outpost nAT and Encounter AT2 are level at 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Outpost nAT
Tire ANokian

Outpost nAT

All Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 36 reviews

Sumitomo Encounter AT2
Tire BSumitomo

Encounter AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 9Provisional

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners – · none yet

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2025 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 70 (est.)72
    Reviews found online73≈ 70 (est.)

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71

    Encounter AT2: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 69.9 (est.) = 71

    No road tests of dry for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No owner ratings of dry for Encounter AT2. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 75

    Wet

    Outpost nAT +2
    73
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 74 (est.)74
    Reviews found online76≈ 73 (est.)

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75

    Encounter AT2: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 72.6 (est.) = 73

    No road tests of wet for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

    No owner ratings of wet for Encounter AT2. The owner half is estimated from its road-test score, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).

  3. 71

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)–
    Reviews found online72–

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 71

    No road tests of snow for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    Encounter AT2 +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)69
    Reviews found online68≈ 69 (est.)

    Outpost nAT: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68

    Encounter AT2: 40% × 69 + 60% × 69.1 (est.) = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of comfort for Encounter AT2. The owner half is the owners’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Noise

    Encounter AT2 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)67
    Reviews found online57≈ 67 (est.)

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.2 = 63

    Encounter AT2: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Encounter AT2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online76–

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceOutpost nATEncounter AT2
    Reviews found online71–
Scores at a glance
Nokian Outpost nAT vs Sumitomo Encounter AT2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNokian Outpost nATSumitomo Encounter AT2
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 71 71
Wet 75 73
Snow 71 –
Comfort 68 69
Noise 63 67
Treadwear 72 –
Handling (owners) 71 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Outpost nAT

± 9

Encounter AT2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Outpost nAT

Pros

  • Exceptional winter weather traction in deep snow, packed snow, and ice
  • Strong wet and dry on-road grip with a planted, firm feel
  • Relatively lightweight construction compared to traditional all-terrain alternatives

Cons

  • Some users experience moderate tread noise or a droning sound at highway speeds
  • Occasional reports of a rougher ride compared to factory highway tires
  • Rare quality control issues such as tire hop or balancing difficulties
All owner themes in the Outpost nAT review

Tire B Encounter AT2

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nokian Outpost nAT B · Sumitomo Encounter AT2
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4730
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 22″
Tread depth14/32″12/32″
UTQG700 A A660 B B
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common2727

Which one should you actually buy?

Nokian Outpost nAT

Sumitomo Encounter AT2

Too close to call: Nokian Outpost nAT and Sumitomo Encounter AT2 are within 2 points overall. Sumitomo Encounter AT2 is stronger on noise. Sumitomo Encounter AT2 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 0 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Sumitomo Encounter AT2 scores 67 vs 63 on noise.

Tire A · Nokian Outpost nAT
Tire B · Sumitomo Encounter AT2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Outpost nAT or Encounter AT2?

Which is better in the wet, Outpost nAT or Encounter AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Outpost nAT or Encounter AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Outpost nAT or Encounter AT2?

Sumitomo Encounter AT2, 67 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Outpost nAT or Encounter AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology