Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 100 reviews
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Nokian Outpost nAT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 36 owner reviews. How we score
Outpost nAT leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 36 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Outpost nAT +172Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 73 74 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
Outpost nAT: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 72
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
65
Wet
Outpost nAT +1075Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 63 76 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65
Outpost nAT: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 75
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Snow
Trail-Terrain T/A +672Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 83 73 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 78
Outpost nAT: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
66
Comfort
Outpost nAT +369Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 64 68 Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.1 = 66
Outpost nAT: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 68.2 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Trail-Terrain T/A +563Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 58 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 68
Outpost nAT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 63
No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
Outpost nAT +172Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 75 76 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71
Outpost nAT: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Outpost nAT +671Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A Outpost nAT Reviews found online 65 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | Nokian Outpost nAT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 72 |
| Dry | 71 | 72 |
| Wet | 65 | 75 |
| Snow | 78 | 72 |
| Comfort | 66 | 69 |
| Noise | 68 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Trail-Terrain T/A
Outpost nAT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tire
- Excellent traction and predictability in snow and winter conditions
- Good ride comfort and smoothness on paved roads
Cons
- Some users report poor wet weather traction and rear-wheel slippage
- A minority of reviewers noted high noise levels on paved tarmac
- Concerns regarding longevity with some users experiencing faster tread wear
Tire B Outpost nAT
Pros
- Exceptional winter weather traction in deep snow, packed snow, and ice
- Strong wet and dry on-road grip with a planted, firm feel
- Relatively lightweight construction compared to traditional all-terrain alternatives
Cons
- Some users experience moderate tread noise or a droning sound at highway speeds
- Occasional reports of a rougher ride compared to factory highway tires
- Rare quality control issues such as tire hop or balancing difficulties
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | B · Nokian Outpost nAT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 50 | 47 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | 700 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 28 | 28 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Nokian Outpost nAT
Narrow edge: Nokian Outpost nAT — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A if snow and noise matter most to you.
Nokian Outpost nAT scores 75 vs 65 on wet.
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 78 vs 72 on snow.
Nokian Outpost nAT scores 71 vs 65 on handling.
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 68 vs 63 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
Nokian Outpost nAT, 75 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 78 vs 72 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 68 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
Nokian Outpost nAT, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology