Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Nokian Outpost nAT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 36 owner reviews. How we score

Outpost nAT leads, 72–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Outpost nAT
Tire BNokian

Outpost nAT

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 36 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Outpost nAT +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7374

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 72

    No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Outpost nAT +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online6376

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 73.9 (est.) + 40% × 76.4 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 78

    Snow

    Trail-Terrain T/A +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8373

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 75.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 78

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Outpost nAT +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6468

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 64.1 = 66

    Outpost nAT: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 68.2 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Trail-Terrain T/A +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6958

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 68

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.5 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Outpost nAT +1
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7576

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71

    Outpost nAT: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Outpost nAT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 65

    Handling (owners)

    Outpost nAT +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/AOutpost nAT
    Reviews found online6571
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Nokian Outpost nAT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/ANokian Outpost nAT
Relative Score 70 72
Dry 71 72
Wet 65 75
Snow 78 72
Comfort 66 69
Noise 68 63
Treadwear 71 72
Handling (owners) 65 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Trail-Terrain T/A

± 7

Outpost nAT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain tire
  • Excellent traction and predictability in snow and winter conditions
  • Good ride comfort and smoothness on paved roads

Cons

  • Some users report poor wet weather traction and rear-wheel slippage
  • A minority of reviewers noted high noise levels on paved tarmac
  • Concerns regarding longevity with some users experiencing faster tread wear
All owner themes in the Trail-Terrain T/A review

Tire B Outpost nAT

Pros

  • Exceptional winter weather traction in deep snow, packed snow, and ice
  • Strong wet and dry on-road grip with a planted, firm feel
  • Relatively lightweight construction compared to traditional all-terrain alternatives

Cons

  • Some users experience moderate tread noise or a droning sound at highway speeds
  • Occasional reports of a rougher ride compared to factory highway tires
  • Rare quality control issues such as tire hop or balancing difficulties
All owner themes in the Outpost nAT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A B · Nokian Outpost nAT
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available5047
Rim diameters15″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth11 - 13/32″14/32″
UTQG660 A A - B700 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common2828

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Nokian Outpost nAT

Narrow edge: Nokian Outpost nAT — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A if snow and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nokian Outpost nAT scores 75 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 78 vs 72 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nokian Outpost nAT scores 71 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 68 vs 63 on noise.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Tire B · Nokian Outpost nAT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

Nokian Outpost nAT, 75 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 78 vs 72 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 68 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

Nokian Outpost nAT, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or Outpost nAT?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology