Head-to-head Updated

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 18 + 17 road tests and 3 + 1,583 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac is ahead, 80–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
± 5

Tests 76 · 18 tests Owners 67 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test (wet handling)

Vredestein Quatrac

Quatrac

All Season

± 4

Tests 81 · 17 tests Owners 79 · 1,583 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 30 in 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test (wet braking)

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Temp 55° F Avg speed 65-80mph 2019 M3 RWD LR Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Quatrac +11
    81
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 17 tests7383
    Reviews found online6778

    Cinturato Winter 2: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 66.5 = 70

    Quatrac: 60% × 83.4 + 40% × 77.9 = 81

  2. 84

    Wet

    Quatrac +8
    92
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 17 tests9196
    Reviews found online7386

    Cinturato Winter 2: 60% × 91.3 + 40% × 73 = 84

    Quatrac: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 85.9 = 92

  3. 74

    Snow

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / 12 tests7675
    Reviews found online7173

    Cinturato Winter 2: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 70.8 = 74

    Quatrac: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 73.4 = 74

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Quatrac +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 2 tests7571
    Reviews found online6475

    Cinturato Winter 2: 40% × 75 + 60% × 64.2 = 69

    Quatrac: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 74.7 = 73

  5. 67

    Noise

    Quatrac +7
    74
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 12 tests6778
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    Cinturato Winter 2: 60% × 67 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 67

    Quatrac: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 74

    No owner ratings of noise for Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Quatrac +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 7 / 7 tests6873
    Reviews found online5778

    Cinturato Winter 2: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 57.1 = 63

    Quatrac: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 78.2 = 75

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Quatrac +10
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Reviews found online6777
  8. 56

    Efficiency

    Quatrac +17
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCinturato Winter 2Quatrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 12 tests5673
Scores at a glance
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryPirelli Cinturato Winter 2Vredestein Quatrac
Relative Score 72 80
Dry 70 81
Wet 84 92
Snow 74 74
Comfort 69 73
Noise 67 74
Treadwear 63 75
Handling (owners) 67 77
Efficiency 56 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Cinturato Winter 2

± 4

Quatrac

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCinturato Winter 2QuatracΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #5/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 90% #8/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #3/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 93% #5/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 90% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 92% #7/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 85% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 97% #6/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 93% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #5/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 99% #2/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test 94% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 98% #4/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 99% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 98% #6/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test 99% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 91% #5/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 90% #2/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Ice Braking Snow 96% #2/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test 91% #13/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 98% #2/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 93% #7/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Circle Snow 99% #2/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test 94% #8/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Snow Handling Snow 96% #8/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test 99% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Handling (tester's mark) Snow 99% #2/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 80% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Slalom Snow 94% #10/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 94% #5/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% #6/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test 78% #5/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #10/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test 98% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Abrasion Treadwear 61% #12/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test 80% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 91% #7/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 95% #3/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 98% #9/12 · 2024 ADAC 16 Inch Winter Tyre Test 96% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 80% #8/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test 93% #3/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 87% #5/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test 77% #6/15 · 2022 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #18/20 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test #14/15 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 57% #16/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test 64% #12/15 · 2025 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #10/15 2025 Teknikens Värld Winter Tire Test R17 #2/9 2027 Auto Motor und Sport Winter Tire Test R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cinturato Winter 2

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence in wet and snowy conditions
  • Strong braking performance on dry surfaces
  • High level of subjective road feedback and handling security

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and concerns regarding overall tire longevity
  • Less precise handling and feedback compared to sportier winter tires
  • Increased road noise and fuel consumption noted by some users
All owner themes in the Cinturato Winter 2 review

Tire B Quatrac

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • Reliable year-round performance, including impressive grip in light to moderate snow and slush
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on most road surfaces

Cons

  • Increased road noise or humming that can develop or worsen as the tires age
  • Faster-than-expected treadwear for some users, leading to shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls that can feel slightly mushy during aggressive cornering or contribute to a wandering sensation at high speeds
All owner themes in the Quatrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Quatrac

Positive

Community members widely view the Vredestein Quatrac lineup as a high-value, comfortable, and quiet alternative to more expensive premium tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2. Drivers frequently praise its smooth ride quality and dependable wet and light-to-moderate snow traction, though several note it does not match dedicated snow tires in severe winter conditions. Concerns occasionally arise regarding faster tread wear, shoulder chunking, and rolling resistance.

r/tires ·6 upvotes ·2026-06-04

“Vredestein Quatrac Pro+s are excellent These tires are phenomenal. I have them on my 2019 Mazda3 and replaced my last set of Continental DWSs. Those were great tires, but I wanted something a bit better for the winter on this replacement, and I was hoping for something a bit quieter for road trips as well. I went with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ and these are *noticeably* quieter than the DWSs, and they ride better as well. I'm a huge fan so far. Read more”

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-01-23

“My wife has been using Vredestein Quatracs for 4 years now. She has done 60,000 km so far (mostly commuting and school runs, but also several longer trips). The tyres still have plenty od tread. During this winter they will reach the winter indicators and they will definitely last through the next summer, so it will be more than 4.5 years and approximately 70,000 km. So far, they have been very good, quiet, very grippy in the wet and fine even in the occasional snow. The car is a small crossover - Opel Mokka, so pretty different to your 325i :) I can definitely recommend them!”

alfaowner.com ·2015-02-21

“You won't find a true performance type tyre at 185/70 as it's just not a profile which is normally associated with performance cars. But as has been said elsewhere it is still the best profile for a fast road set up on a 105. I'd also support vredestein too, I use quatracs which are hybrid tyre designed as a compromise between a snow and a winter, they work well all year round. Vred also do a more summer biased tyre now which wasn't available at 185/70 until fairly recently I expect they would be my choice now. Edit, just checked they are called spotrtrac5 Not sure about vred classics being used in classic rallying, most people I know use either snowtrac3 or quatracs tout of a vreds range, though the rules changed at the start of last year which allowed 65 profiles to be used which had opened up more choice.”

Top themes
#Ride comfort and low noise#Wet and rain traction#Snow and winter capability#Affordable premium alternative#Tread wear and longevity#Shoulder wear and chunking#Rolling resistance and EV range

Based on 64 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 B · Vredestein Quatrac
CategoryWinterAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4139
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

Vredestein Quatrac

Winner: Vredestein Quatrac — better efficiency, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Vredestein Quatrac scores 73 vs 56 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Quatrac scores 75 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac scores 81 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Quatrac scores 77 vs 67 on handling.

Tire A · Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Which is better in the wet, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 92 vs 84 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 81 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 74 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 74 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 69 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 75 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Cinturato Winter 2 or Quatrac?

Vredestein Quatrac, 73 vs 56 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology