Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 33 reviews
Pirelli Scorpion ATR vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 33 + 278 owner reviews. How we score
Scorpion ATR is ahead, 69–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 278 reviews
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Scorpion ATR +2944Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 75 31 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 75.4 = 73
Crugen HP71: 60% × 52.5 (est.) + 40% × 30.7 = 44
No road tests of dry for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
67
Wet
Scorpion ATR +1651Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 65 44 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67
Crugen HP71: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 43.9 = 51
No road tests of wet for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
Scorpion ATR +1253Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 62 41 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
Crugen HP71: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
No road tests of snow for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
Scorpion ATR +2544Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 69 32 Scorpion ATR: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69
Crugen HP71: 40% × 61.3 (est.) + 60% × 32.1 = 44
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
Scorpion ATR +1454Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 36 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 68
Crugen HP71: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 54
No road tests of noise for Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Scorpion ATR +2937Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 49 (est.) Reviews found online 66 18 Scorpion ATR: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 66
Crugen HP71: 60% × 49.3 (est.) + 40% × 18.4 = 37
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion ATR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Crugen HP71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Scorpion ATR +2051Why this score
Source Scorpion ATR Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 71 51
Scores at a glance
| Category | Pirelli Scorpion ATR | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 47 |
| Dry | 73 | 44 |
| Wet | 67 | 51 |
| Snow | 65 | 53 |
| Comfort | 69 | 44 |
| Noise | 68 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 37 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 51 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Scorpion ATR
Crugen HP71
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Scorpion ATR | Crugen HP71 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 2025 Autobild Pirelli All-Terrain Tire Test R19 | #8/9 2021 Teknikens Värld Summer Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Scorpion ATR
Pros
- Exceptionally smooth and quiet ride on the highway for an all-terrain tire
- Confident dry and wet traction with reliable handling in rain and mud
- Sturdy construction offering good puncture resistance on rough terrain
Cons
- Poor performance in deep, hard-packed snow and ice
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing rapid wear or steel belts showing prematurely
- Wet traction and hydroplaning resistance decline noticeably as the tread wears down
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Strong value: frequently described as much cheaper than Michelin, Pirelli or Bridgestone alternatives while not feeling like a budget tire.
- Good wet and heavy-rain traction, with some reports of confident light-snow performance.
- Quiet, smooth ride reported by many owners, often as an improvement over the stock tires (Bridgestone Dueler, Pirelli, Hankook).
Cons
- Premature or uneven tread wear is the most common complaint, with reports of tires worn out at roughly 15,000 to 27,000 miles or within 1.5 years, far below the 65,000-mile rating.
- Road and highway noise, including howling that develops with mileage, reported by several owners.
- Vibration and difficulty keeping the tires balanced, in some cases even after repeated balancing and rotations.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Pirelli Scorpion ATR
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community opinions on the Kumho Crugen HP71 (including EV variants) are generally mixed, primarily leaning on price and initial comfort versus longevity. Many users appreciate the affordable pricing, quiet/smooth ride, and good handling, but a significant number report faster-than-expected tread wear and occasional issues with foam lining separation or durability on heavier vehicles.
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
“How many miles do you guys get on tires? I had a blowout back in June, and decided to just buy a full set. The shop had a promo on these KumHo Crugen HP71 tires, which had a 65,000 mile warranty. 3 months and 12,000 miles later, my tread is completely gone. I got some Michelins and was credited 185 bucks per tire, but this seems insanely low mileage to wear out the tread completely. I know the added weight and torque of an EV somewhat lowers the lifespan of tires, but even if I was driving like a demon, I don't think 12,000 miles should be anywhere near the lifespan of a reputable brand.”
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
Based on 52 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Scorpion ATR | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 A B | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: Pirelli Scorpion ATR — better dry, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pirelli Scorpion ATR scores 73 vs 44 on dry.
Pirelli Scorpion ATR scores 66 vs 37 on treadwear.
Pirelli Scorpion ATR scores 69 vs 44 on comfort.
Pirelli Scorpion ATR scores 71 vs 51 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Which is better in the wet, Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 67 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 73 vs 44 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 68 vs 54 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 69 vs 44 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Scorpion ATR or Crugen HP71?
Pirelli Scorpion ATR, 66 vs 37 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology