Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 0 road tests and 1,302 + 199 owner reviews. How we score
Turanza ER300 is ahead, 68–63
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 1,302 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My mom's mercedes GLC300 came with pirelli scorpion Verde tires and they have 1/32" measured left on the wear bars after less than 30k miles. My mother drives like a grandma too. They're fine for turns and pep on Florida roads but absurdly short wear time.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 199 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 69 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 68 |
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 68.7 + 40% × 56.3 = 64
Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 70 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 70 |
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 61.1 = 67
Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 63 |
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Verde. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 53 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 63 |
Scorpion Verde: 40% × 52.5 + 60% × 58.6 = 56
Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 75 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 54 | 71 |
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 54.3 = 67
Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 61 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 51 | 70 |
Scorpion Verde: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Verde. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 59 | 65 |
| Source | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 73 | – |
| Category | Pirelli Scorpion Verde | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 68 |
| Dry | 64 | 68 |
| Wet | 67 | 70 |
| Snow | 64 | 66 |
| Comfort | 56 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 65 |
| Efficiency | 73 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Scorpion Verde
Turanza ER300
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Scorpion Verde | Turanza ER300 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/7 2025 Autobild Pirelli All-Terrain Tire Test R19 | #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli Scorpion Verde is polarized across different performance categories. While drivers frequently praise its quiet ride, responsive dry handling, and solid wet traction, many report poor snow and winter performance, alongside notable complaints of premature tread wear, cracking, and chunking.
“Got a set of Pirelli Scorpion Verde all season for an EV9 recently. Ordered because I needed a higher treadwear count more than anything. Marcus in village tyres. Sound as a pound, will try and source whatever you want. Will also take delivery and fit anything you might order yourself 👌🏼”
“Have to say, never had an issue with the Pirelli Scorpion Verde tyres, now on my 3rd Tig fitted OEM”
“Well I drove about 120 miles on them on the way back from Detroit and I'm impressed so far, although I don't know if it's the tires or the overall depax experience. Road noise is good or at least not worse than the pax Michelins. Haven't had the pleasure of driving in crummy weather yet but will update when I do. There isn't a huge mileage difference but it seemed like I had an easier time keeping the VCM engaged at speeds below the point where wind resistance starts playing a factor.”
Based on 73 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Scorpion Verde | B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 66 | 23 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 14″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 A A | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 1 | 1 |
Pirelli Scorpion Verde
Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 57 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 56 on comfort.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 59 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 67 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 64 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
