Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 483 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
Proxes ST is ahead, 71–60
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 483 reviews
“I bought a set of 20” M-wheels when I my X5 was at around 2k miles. I had fitted Pirelli scorpion zero runflats on it. At 65k miles, they had to be replaced due to compound cracking, thread was still at 5 to 6/32. I think they served me well.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 14 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 75 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
Proxes ST: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 77 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 64
Proxes ST: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 64 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 57
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 63.6 = 66
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 55 | 74 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62
Proxes ST: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero or Proxes ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 61 | – |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 65
No road tests of noise for Scorpion Zero. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 45 | 72 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54
Proxes ST: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 57 | 71 |
| Category | Pirelli Scorpion Zero | Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 71 |
| Dry | 63 | 72 |
| Wet | 64 | 75 |
| Snow | 57 | 66 |
| Comfort | 62 | 72 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 54 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Scorpion Zero
Proxes ST
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli Scorpion Zero is mixed, with strong praise for its quiet ride, smooth comfort, and reliable wet and dry traction, especially on newer AS Plus 3 models. However, numerous owners express severe frustration over fast treadwear, with many reporting tires wearing out or balding well under 30,000 miles, alongside complaints regarding unhonored treadwear warranties and issues with the internal PNCS noise-canceling foam.
“Quote: Originally Posted by MurrayA4 ... Is a very logical conclusion to reach.The spread between "ultra high perf." tires and many "touring" tires has shrunk a great deal.Sounds like the Verde is pretty respectable .Any idea what the UTQG ratings are on those ? I'm lazy ! Pirelli Scorpion Verde A/S 265/40/R21 - 105V (150mph) - UTQG 600AA - 34lbs, 12/32" Tread Depth, 29.3" Diameter Pirelli Scorpion Zero A/S Plus 265/40/R21 - 105Y (186mph) - UTQG 500AA - 33lbs, 10/32" Tread Depth, 29.3 Diameter I think if you tended more towards summer tires and/or lived in a dry-ish climate and could get a good price, the Zero A/S is a good tire. You might only get 30K out of them on a heavy performance SUV but compared to more expensive options the differences seem minimal. Personally, on a truck/SUV I've never experienced a tire rated 600AA have as good performance/stickiness (combined with long treadlife) as the Verdes...”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Spooled 295/45/20 ST-III's on mine. They work great dry and wet. I can do 60 rolls on 10lbs and they stick. 305/40/22 Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asmmetrico...20 rolls on 15psi and they stick. lol”
“Pirelli Scorpion MS vs. Zero I was the unfortunate recipient of a giant screw in my tire last week and had to be towed to a local Discount Tire for a replacement. After being very specific that I wanted the exact same tire that I had (Scorpion MS), they installed the Scorpion Zero on my front right wheel and I just realized it this morning. Is there any damage in keeping this tire if it’s the exact same size? Or should I push back and request they replace it with the tire I have on the three other wheels? Not to mention I’m a little irritated because I feel like it was a sneaky upsell to get me to buy a tire that is $150 more expensive. Thoughts? Read more”
Based on 58 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Scorpion Zero | B · Toyo Proxes ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 23″ | 19″ |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Toyo Proxes ST
Winner: Toyo Proxes ST — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Toyo Proxes ST rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 69 vs 54 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 71 vs 57 on handling.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 75 vs 64 on wet.
Toyo Proxes ST scores 72 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Toyo Proxes ST, 75 vs 64 on our wet score.
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 63 on our dry score.
Toyo Proxes ST, 66 vs 57 on our snow score.
Toyo Proxes ST, 72 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Toyo Proxes ST, 69 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
