Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Riken Raptor HR vs Firestone RoadHawk — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 17 road tests and 1 + 644 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 40 · 644 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)
“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison68Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 16 tests – 82 Reviews found online – 46 RoadHawk: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 46.4 = 68
-
–
Wet
No comparison65Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests – 77 Reviews found online – 48 RoadHawk: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 47.5 = 65
-
–
Comfort
No comparison51Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 67 Reviews found online – 40 RoadHawk: 40% × 67 + 60% × 39.6 = 51
-
–
Noise
No comparison45Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 30 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) RoadHawk: 60% × 30.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 45
No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison50Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 65 Reviews found online – 29 RoadHawk: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 28.5 = 50
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison36Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Reviews found online – 36 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source Raptor HR RoadHawk Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Riken Raptor HR | Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 58 |
| Dry | – | 68 |
| Wet | – | 65 |
| Comfort | – | 51 |
| Noise | – | 45 |
| Treadwear | – | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 36 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Raptor HR
58
/ 100
RoadHawk
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Raptor HR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B RoadHawk
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
- Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
- Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption
Cons
- Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
- Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
- Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Riken Raptor HR
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Firestone RoadHawk
Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.
r/automobil
·2025-11-20
“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2023-09-18
“Not sure if it is what you are looking for. I am Polish but I live in the USA. I am still following info from Poland but I am not buying tires there anymore. A magazine Motor tests tires. magazynauto.pl Firestone was included in their "accessibly priced" summer tires: Firestone Roadhawk. They lost to Uniroyal, Semperit, Dębica but were ahead of Kumho, Apollo, Tomket, Imperial and Double Coin. They were not included in their premium and middle priced test. German based Auto Bild (and its Polish version Auto Świat) did a test in 2019 and the same Roadhawk passed the elimination test (53 down to 20: wet and dry braking distances added together as #13) and finished #18 in detailed test. So Firestone is present in Poland and Europe as a cheaper brand from Bridgestone but how popular it is I do not know. Krzyś”
Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Riken Raptor HR | B · Firestone RoadHawk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Grand Touring All-Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 115 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Riken Raptor HR
58
/ 100
Firestone RoadHawk
Only Firestone RoadHawk has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Riken Raptor HR
Tire B · Firestone RoadHawk
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology