Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Head-to-head
Updated
Riken Raptor HR vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 5 road tests and 1 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 5 tests Owners 71 · 28 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (snow braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison67Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 65 Reviews found online – 71 Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 71.3 = 67
-
–
Wet
No comparison71Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 70 Reviews found online – 74 Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 70.1 + 40% × 73.5 = 71
-
–
Snow
No comparison70Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 72 Reviews found online – 66 Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 72 + 40% × 66.4 = 70
-
–
Comfort
No comparison70Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 Winter i cept evo2: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Winter i cept evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 47 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 47.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 55
No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison69Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 67 Reviews found online – 73 Winter i cept evo2: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 72.6 = 69
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison73Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Reviews found online – 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison59Why this score
Source Raptor HR Winter i cept evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests – 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Riken Raptor HR | Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 69 |
| Dry | – | 67 |
| Wet | – | 71 |
| Snow | – | 70 |
| Comfort | – | 70 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | – | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
Raptor HR
69
/ 100
Winter i cept evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Raptor HR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Winter i cept evo2
Pros
- Impressive grip and traction on snow and ice
- High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
- Good value for money compared to higher-priced premium alternatives
Cons
- Soft sidewalls or goofy feel on dry roads, particularly in warmer winter temperatures
- Performance and grip degrade significantly as the tire ages over multiple seasons
- Can struggle to put down high torque/power on rear-wheel-drive vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Riken Raptor HR | B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Grand Touring All-Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 79 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Riken Raptor HR
69
/ 100
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Only Hankook Winter i cept evo2 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Riken Raptor HR
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology