Head-to-head Updated

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 10 road tests and 11 + 68 owner reviews. How we score

Winter Sottozero 3 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
± 6

Tests 67 · 10 tests Owners 80 · 68 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Winter Sottozero 3 +4
    76
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 70 (est.)73
    Reviews found online7482

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 72

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 81.7 = 76

    No road tests of dry for Iceblazer Alpine Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Winter Sottozero 3 +16
    83
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 10 tests5980
    Reviews found online7787
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–179%93%

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo: 60% × 59.5 + 40% × 77.1 = 67

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 80.4 + 40% × 86.5 = 83

  3. 70

    Snow

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 70 (est.)56
    Reviews found online6979

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 70

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 56.5 + 40% × 78.8 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Iceblazer Alpine Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Winter Sottozero 3 +4
    74
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7175

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 70.6 = 70

    Winter Sottozero 3: 40% × 72.1 + 60% × 74.5 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for Iceblazer Alpine Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–64
    Reviews found online–82

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 81.6 = 71

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)57
    Reviews found online7075

    Iceblazer Alpine Evo: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69

    Winter Sottozero 3: 60% × 57.1 + 40% × 74.6 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Iceblazer Alpine Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Winter Sottozero 3 +11
    82
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Reviews found online7182
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourceIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–76
Scores at a glance
Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo vs Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3: scores by category (0–100)
CategorySailun Iceblazer Alpine EvoPirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Relative Score 70 74
Dry 72 76
Wet 67 83
Snow 70 65
Comfort 70 74
Noise – 71
Treadwear 69 64
Handling (owners) 71 82
Efficiency – 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Iceblazer Alpine Evo

± 6

Winter Sottozero 3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo finished ahead 0 times and Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryIceblazer Alpine EvoWinter Sottozero 3ΔHead-to-head
Wet Braking Wet 79% 93% −14.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview · 225/45 R17
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #43/45 #16/45 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview · 225/45 R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Iceblazer Alpine Evo

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong traction and handling in deep snow and wet conditions
  • High levels of ride comfort and relatively low road noise

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet braking performance reported by some users
  • Slower steering response and lack of tactile road feedback
  • Occasional high-speed instability or pitching at highway speeds
All owner themes in the Iceblazer Alpine Evo review

Tire B Winter Sottozero 3

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and resistance to hydroplaning.
  • Strong dry-road handling and steering precision for a winter tire.
  • Excellent traction and stability in snow and slush.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, particularly if driven in temperatures above 15°C or year-round.
  • Susceptibility to sidewall damage and bubbling when encountering road hazards.
  • Increased noise levels as the tire ages and tread depth decreases.
All owner themes in the Winter Sottozero 3 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo B · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7798
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 21″
Tread depth—10/32″
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common4242

Which one should you actually buy?

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

Narrow edge: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo if snow and treadwear matter most to you. Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 83 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 scores 82 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo scores 70 vs 65 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.

Tire A · Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo
Tire B · Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Iceblazer Alpine Evo or Winter Sottozero 3?

Which is better in the wet, Iceblazer Alpine Evo or Winter Sottozero 3?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 83 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Iceblazer Alpine Evo or Winter Sottozero 3?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 76 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Iceblazer Alpine Evo or Winter Sottozero 3?

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo, 70 vs 65 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Iceblazer Alpine Evo or Winter Sottozero 3?

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Iceblazer Alpine Evo or Winter Sottozero 3?

Sailun Iceblazer Alpine Evo, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology