Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 1,120 reviews
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +169Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 68 70 -
67
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +572Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 66 73 -
70
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +272Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 70 74 -
68
Treadwear
NanoEnergy 3 +365Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 69 65 -
68
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +573Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 68 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 70 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 67 | 72 |
| Comfort | 70 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 65 |
| Handling | 68 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
NanoEnergy 3
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 48 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet and handling. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy 3 if treadwear matters most to you.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 68 on handling.
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 68 vs 65 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.