Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 1,120 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1,120 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +271Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 73 NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +775Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 66 76 NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +574Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 76 NanoEnergy 3: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for NanoEnergy 3 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
NanoEnergy 3 +467Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 67 NanoEnergy 3: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 71
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for NanoEnergy 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
70
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +777Why this score
Source NanoEnergy 3 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 70 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 72 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 68 | 75 |
| Comfort | 69 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 71 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 70 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
NanoEnergy 3
72
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A NanoEnergy 3
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noticeably low road noise
- Great value for money and affordable pricing
- Impression-worthy tread wear longevity and slow wear rate
Cons
- Unpredictable or sub-par wet weather grip, leading to occasional sliding or hydroplaning concerns
- Soft sidewalls that can compromise sharp turn-in response and cause tire flex during hard cornering
- Reduced performance and hardening after extended use (over multiple years)
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 48 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 39 | 39 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Toyo NanoEnergy 3
72
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the Toyo NanoEnergy 3 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 69 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Toyo NanoEnergy 3 scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.
Tire A · Toyo NanoEnergy 3
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
NanoEnergy 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, NanoEnergy 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, NanoEnergy 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, NanoEnergy 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, NanoEnergy 3 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Toyo NanoEnergy 3, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology