Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 1 road tests and 9 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac 5 SUV leads, 69–67 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 67 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests | 56 | 74 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 69 |
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 72.5 = 62
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 74 + 40% × 69.2 = 72
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests | 65 | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 69 |
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 68
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 76 + 40% × 68.6 = 73
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 72 |
| Reviews found online | – | 70 |
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 72 + 40% × 69.5 = 71
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 62 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 69 |
Proxes CF2 SUV: 40% × 61.8 + 60% × 75.2 = 70
Quatrac 5 SUV: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests | 67 | 60 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 62
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 69 (est.) | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 61 |
Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70
Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 68 |
| Source | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests | 56 | 72 |
| Category | Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV | Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 69 |
| Dry | 62 | 72 |
| Wet | 68 | 73 |
| Snow | – | 71 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Noise | 67 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 68 |
| Efficiency | 56 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Proxes CF2 SUV
Quatrac 5 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Proxes CF2 SUV | Quatrac 5 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 92% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 94% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 91% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 100% #1/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test | 96% #8/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 81% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 89% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #7/8 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | #4/8 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV | B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | — |
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV
Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV — better efficiency, dry and wet. Pick the Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV if treadwear and noise matter most to you. Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV scores 72 vs 56 on efficiency.
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV scores 72 vs 62 on dry.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 70 vs 63 on treadwear.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 67 vs 62 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 72 vs 62 on our dry score.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 70 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 72 vs 56 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology