Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 1 road tests and 9 + 4 owner reviews. How we score

Quatrac 5 SUV leads, 69–67 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Tire AToyo

Proxes CF2 SUV

Summer

± 9

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 72 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test (noise)

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV

Quatrac 5 SUV

All Season

± 7Provisional

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 67 · 4 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 62

    Dry

    Quatrac 5 SUV +10
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests5674
    Reviews found online7369

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 72.5 = 62

    Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 74 + 40% × 69.2 = 72

  2. 68

    Wet

    Quatrac 5 SUV +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6576
    Reviews found online7269

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 71.6 = 68

    Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 76 + 40% × 68.6 = 73

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–72
    Reviews found online–70

    Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 72 + 40% × 69.5 = 71

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Proxes CF2 SUV +1
    69
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests62≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 40% × 61.8 + 60% × 75.2 = 70

    Quatrac 5 SUV: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.1 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Quatrac 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 67

    Noise

    Proxes CF2 SUV +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests6760
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 67

    Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF2 SUV +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7261

    Proxes CF2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 70

    Quatrac 5 SUV: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Quatrac 5 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes CF2 SUV +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Reviews found online7268
  8. 56

    Efficiency

    Quatrac 5 SUV +16
    72
    Why this score
    SourceProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests5672
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes CF2 SUVVredestein Quatrac 5 SUV
Relative Score 67 69
Dry 62 72
Wet 68 73
Snow – 71
Comfort 70 69
Noise 67 62
Treadwear 70 63
Handling (owners) 72 68
Efficiency 56 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 9

Proxes CF2 SUV

± 7

Quatrac 5 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryProxes CF2 SUVQuatrac 5 SUVΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 94% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 91% #5/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 93% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #11/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 100% #2/11 · 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tyre Test 96% #8/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 81% #8/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 89% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/8 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test #4/8 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes CF2 SUV

Pros

  • Significantly quieter and smoother ride compared to stock or competitor tires
  • Excellent dry grip and handling performance
  • Good value for money with favorable durability and wear characteristics

Cons

  • Wet grip performance may degrade or feel less confident over time for some users
  • Occasional low-frequency rolling noise noted on rough road surfaces
  • Wet weather traction can reach its limits during spirited cornering
All owner themes in the Proxes CF2 SUV review

Tire B Quatrac 5 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent grip and confidence in heavy snow and icy rural roads
  • Greatly improved wet handling and reduced stopping distances
  • High level of ride comfort and low cabin noise

Cons

  • Long-term wear remains unproven for drivers with very low mileage use
All owner themes in the Quatrac 5 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available29—
Rim diameters15″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV

Narrow edge: Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV — better efficiency, dry and wet. Pick the Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV if treadwear and noise matter most to you. Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV scores 72 vs 56 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV scores 72 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 70 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV scores 67 vs 62 on noise.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Tire B · Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 72 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, 70 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Proxes CF2 SUV or Quatrac 5 SUV?

Vredestein Quatrac 5 SUV, 72 vs 56 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology