Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 900 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes TR1 leads, 64–61 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire AToyo

Proxes TR1

Summer

Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 900 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (subj. comfort)

“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests53≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6858

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 68.3 = 59

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Proxes TR1 +10
    57
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests66≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6853

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 68 = 67

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6062

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 60.1 = 65

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 68

    No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6164

    Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 63

    Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 70

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes TR1 +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceProxes TR1Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
    Reviews found online7058
Scores at a glance
Toyo Proxes TR1 vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryToyo Proxes TR1Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Relative Score 64 61
Dry 59 61
Wet 67 57
Comfort 65 65
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 63 65
Handling (owners) 70 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Proxes TR1

Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Proxes TR1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and responsive steering feedback
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium tier-one brands
  • Attractive and aggressive directional tread design

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise and humming sounds at certain speeds
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a slight squirm or delayed initial steering response
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear axles
All owner themes in the Proxes TR1 review

Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
  • Adequate dry road grip and handling

Cons

  • Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
  • Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
All owner themes in the Geolandar G055 Blue Earth review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Toyo Proxes TR1

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.

Top themes
#Wet grip performance#Soft sidewall stiffness#Affordable price point#Road noise issues#Ride comfort comparison#Handling at limit#T1R model confusion

Based on 36 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Toyo Proxes TR1 B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available61—
Rim diameters14″ – 20″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Toyo Proxes TR1

Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

Narrow edge: Toyo Proxes TR1 — better handling and wet. Where the Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 70 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 67 vs 57 on wet.

Tire A · Toyo Proxes TR1
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Proxes TR1 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Which is better in the wet, Proxes TR1 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Toyo Proxes TR1, 67 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Proxes TR1 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 61 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Proxes TR1 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Proxes TR1 or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology