Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 12 + 4 road tests and 4,560 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 12 tests Owners 65 · 4,560 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Odlicne. Malo se brze trose ali drže ko lude. Imao 2 seta rainsport 3 i jedan set rainsport 5. Nažalost, na novom autu je dimenzija u kojoj nema rainsporta tako da uopce ne znam sta da kupim”
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 3 tests | 54 | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 58 | 68 |
RainSport 5: 60% × 54.4 + 40% × 57.8 = 56
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 3 tests | 87 | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 64 |
RainSport 5: 60% × 87 + 40% × 76.4 = 83
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 52 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 12 |
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.3 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 62 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 61 |
RainSport 5: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.3 = 68
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
No road tests of comfort for RainSport 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests | 74 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 60 |
RainSport 5: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69
No owner ratings of noise for RainSport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 3 tests | 57 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 61 | 59 |
RainSport 5: 60% × 56.6 + 40% × 60.6 = 58
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 62 | 72 |
| Source | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 1 tests | 56 | 71 |
| Category | Uniroyal RainSport 5 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 56 | 74 |
| Wet | 83 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 68 | 62 |
| Noise | 71 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 56 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
RainSport 5
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | RainSport 5 | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 88% #33/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 98% #2/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 86% #18/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #7/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 99% #5/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 61% #10/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 94% #7/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 79% #7/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #7/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | #14/20 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 69% #8/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | 57% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #24/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment towards the Uniroyal RainSport 5 is largely positive, with frequent praise for its outstanding wet grip, comfortable ride, and solid value as a mid-range tire. While many drivers consider it an ideal option for wet climates and light hot hatches, several users note that it wears out relatively quickly compared to premium alternatives.
“I got Rainsport 5 and they are above average very impressive grip in the wet low tyre noise as well.”
“Uniroyal rainsport 5 Ciao a tutti, Ho un dubbio: sto montando i pneumatici indicati sul titolo ma, pur non avendo un disegno speculare tra interno ed esterno non indicano il verso di rotazione. E’indicato solo interno ed esterno. Allego foto pneumatico anteriore dx. È indifferente se questo pneumatico l’avessi montato sulla parte anteriore sx ? Read more”
“Michelin PS4/PS5 Vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Uniroyal Rainsport 5? Thanks again for you oil related answers! Looks like my front cheap dealership tyres need to be changed and I have decided to go for a much better performance oriented tyre. I have limited my options down to these 3 as per recommendations among other owners and reviews I've read. Although they all seem to be very evenly matched to one another. I noticed the price is where they differ. The Uniroyals, although well sued and recommended among the community (including the tyre saleswoman who has a wrx), are €90 a tyre which isn't so bad. The goodyears are €97 per tyre and finally the Michelins are the most expensive at an impressive €122 for PS4's and €130 for PS5s. Is the price hike worth it? or would it better to settle for the more affordable but still capable goodyears and Uniroyals? my GTI is my daily and fun car so something capable of both would be great thanks!”
Based on 21 community posts
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Based on 22 community posts
| Attribute | A · Uniroyal RainSport 5 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 104 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 60 | 60 |
Uniroyal RainSport 5
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, efficiency and treadwear. Pick the Uniroyal RainSport 5 if wet and comfort matter most to you.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 56 on dry.
Uniroyal RainSport 5 scores 83 vs 67 on wet.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 56 on efficiency.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Uniroyal RainSport 5, 83 vs 67 on our wet score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 56 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Uniroyal RainSport 5, 68 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 56 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
