Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 865 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Quatrac Pro+ 71, Geolandar X-CV G057 70.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 69 · 14 tests Owners 73 · 865 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2024 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
“2024 Prius XLE w/17in. wheel and tire downsize. I recently swapped out the 19in OEM wheels and tires for 225/55r17 Verdestien Quatrac Pro+ mounted on Borbet Type W wheels (anthracite). I don't have a ton of mileage on them, but so far, I'm pretty happy with the results. Read more”
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 16 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests | 62 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 78 |
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 75.9 = 67
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests | 80 | ≈ 75 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 81 | 79 |
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 81.1 = 81
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 77
No road tests of wet for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests | 64 | ≈ 60 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 37 |
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 64.4 + 40% × 68.5 = 66
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50
No road tests of snow for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 66 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 74 |
Quatrac Pro+: 40% × 66.1 + 60% × 71.3 = 69
Geolandar X-CV G057: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.5 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 82 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 73 |
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 81.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 76
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 65 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 65 |
Quatrac Pro+: 60% × 64.9 + 40% × 63.2 = 64
Geolandar X-CV G057: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar X-CV G057. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 76 | 76 |
| Source | Quatrac Pro+ | Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 53 | – |
| Category | Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ | Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 70 |
| Dry | 67 | 75 |
| Wet | 81 | 77 |
| Snow | 66 | 50 |
| Comfort | 69 | 72 |
| Noise | 76 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 76 |
| Efficiency | 53 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Quatrac Pro+
Geolandar X-CV G057
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion is largely favorable, with owners praising the Quatrac Pro+ for strong wet grip, a quiet and comfortable ride, and good value. Its 3PMSF rating gives better snow capability than regular all-seasons, though many say it leans toward wet and sporty performance rather than deep snow. Critics and comparison posts note that it trails the best all-weather tires, such as the CrossClimate2, and UHP all-seasons, such as the DWS06+, in braking and handling. A few isolated complaints involve shoulder chunking, air loss and a slow leak.
“I just put the Vrederstein Quatrac Pro+ on my 24 Mini Countryman S All4, replacing the Pirelli runflats that were good tires, but kinda loud and you could feel every imperfection in the road. I don't have a lot of miles on em yet, but they are definitely quieter and more comfortable. I've noticed that they do like to lose a little bit of air, don't know if it's the tires or the valve stems, or the installer didn't seal the bead on em good enough. Will monitor it and if it keeps up, I'll take em back and have em checked. So far I like them.”
“I had a different set of tires, but also with the slightest wet roads, slipping all over. This summer I went with Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, traction so far has been great for me in the wet and pretty quiet (61 decibels in the cabin at highway speed).”
“23 Model Y LR....just did my first tire change at 41k miles from stock Contis to Vredestein Quatrac Pro+. Better all the way around, no foam. There is not much of a road noise difference, maybe a bit louder going over concrete sections on some highways. I don't buy into the foam theory. Noise comes from tire composition and tread hitting varying surfaces. Every tire will give a different sound and sound level, foam or not.”
Based on 65 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ | B · Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 103 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 520 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 36 | 36 |
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057
Too close to call: Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ and Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 are within 2 points overall. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ is stronger on snow, noise and wet. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 is stronger on dry and comfort. Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 66 vs 50 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057 scores 75 vs 67 on dry.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 76 vs 69 on noise.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ scores 81 vs 77 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 81 vs 77 on our wet score.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 75 vs 67 on our dry score.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 66 vs 50 on our snow score.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+, 76 vs 69 on our noise score.
Yokohama Geolandar X-CV G057, 72 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
