Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 80 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ultrac Satin is ahead, 75–70
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,186 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
ADVAN Fleva V701 +874Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) 54 77 Reviews found online 83 69 Dry Braking (% of best) 92% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 99% -
78
Wet
Ultrac Satin +1068Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) 75 70 Reviews found online 82 65 Wet Braking (% of best) 88% 87% Wet Handling (% of best) 98% 97% -
–
Snow
No comparison36Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online – 14 -
89
Comfort
Ultrac Satin +2663Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) 95 62 Reviews found online 80 64 -
77
Noise
Ultrac Satin +869Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) 84 74 Reviews found online – 61 -
72
Treadwear
Ultrac Satin +369Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 74 Reviews found online 74 61 -
81
Handling
Ultrac Satin +1071Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 81 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Satin | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 70 |
| Dry | 66 | 74 |
| Wet | 78 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 89 | 63 |
| Noise | 77 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 69 |
| Handling | 81 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Ultrac Satin
70
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Ultrac Satin | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 92% #9/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | −5.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #4/10 · 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test | 99% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −0.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 75% #8/10 · 2020 New 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −7.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −8.6 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 71% #8/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 66% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.9 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 6% #16/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout | +10.4 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #5/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +3.8 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 100% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +44.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% #8/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | 87% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #3/10 · 2020 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 97% #19/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultrac Satin
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- High value-for-money proposition compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a 'wobbly' or 'sway' feeling during hard cornering
- Lack of sharp steering feedback compared to dedicated performance tires
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users noting rapid wear
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Neutral
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
alltrac.net
·2025-04-09
“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
fiestastforum.com
·2022-11-30
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Satin | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 52 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Satin — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 89 vs 63 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 78 vs 68 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 81 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 77 vs 69 on noise.
Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.