Tests 70 · 8 tests Owners 85 · 45 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
Head-to-head
Updated
Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 8 + 4 road tests and 45 + 2,195 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac Satin is ahead, 76–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,195 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
ADVAN Fleva V701 +774Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 3 tests 54 78 Reviews found online 87 68 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 94% 98% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 98% 99% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 53.9 + 40% × 86.9 = 67
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74
-
80
Wet
Ultrac Satin +1367Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 3 tests 76 70 Reviews found online 86 64 Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 92% 86% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 99% 97% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
-
–
Snow
No comparison36Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online – 12 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.4 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
87
Comfort
Ultrac Satin +2562Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests 92 62 Reviews found online 84 61 Ultrac Satin: 40% × 92.3 + 60% × 83.7 = 87
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
-
77
Noise
Ultrac Satin +869Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests 85 75 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) 60 Ultrac Satin: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 77
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.6 + 40% × 59.7 = 69
No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac Satin. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
74
Treadwear
Ultrac Satin +569Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 70 75 Reviews found online 81 59 Wear (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 71% 71% Ultrac Satin: 60% × 69.7 + 40% × 80.7 = 74
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
-
85
Handling (owners)
Ultrac Satin +1372Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 85 72 -
71
Efficiency
Level71Why this score
Source Ultrac Satin ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / 1 tests 71 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Vredestein Ultrac Satin | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 69 |
| Dry | 67 | 74 |
| Wet | 80 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 87 | 62 |
| Noise | 77 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 85 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 71 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Ultrac Satin
69
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 2 tests that ran both, Vredestein Ultrac Satin finished ahead 2 times and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Ultrac Satin | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% | 98% | −3.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% | 99% | −0.8 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% | 86% | +6.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% | 97% | +2.3 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 100% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 71% | 71% | +0.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 225/50 R17 |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 79% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test | 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/43 | #15/43 | – | 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Shootout · 225/50 R17 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ultrac Satin
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and low road noise levels
- Strong wet-weather grip and resistance to aquaplaning
- High value-for-money proposition compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a 'wobbly' or 'sway' feeling during hard cornering
- Lack of sharp steering feedback compared to dedicated performance tires
- Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users noting rapid wear
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Vredestein Ultrac Satin | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 52 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Vredestein Ultrac Satin
69
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Satin — better comfort, wet and handling. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 87 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 80 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 85 vs 72 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Vredestein Ultrac Satin scores 77 vs 69 on noise.
Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 80 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 77 vs 69 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 87 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Vredestein Ultrac Satin, 74 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, Ultrac Satin or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 71 on the efficiency score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology