Head-to-head Updated

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs Yokohama ADVAN A052 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 5 road tests and 8 + 213 owner reviews. How we score

Ultrac Vorti R is ahead, 77–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R

Ultrac Vorti R

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 76 · 8 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

Yokohama ADVAN A052
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN A052

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 5 tests Owners 68 · 213 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))

“Staggered BBSs Need Tires I have a set of BBS wheels that i have been restoring for my 89 944 NA. I am trying to figure out what tires to get and am running into a bit of trouble. The set of BBSs are 15in staggered. The front are 8in wide and the rear are 9in wide. When i had purchased these wheels they had 215/60R15s all around. Would this be a good fitment? I am hoping the rear will not look stretched. As i was researching staggered tires i ran into problems finding a matching set in the sizes 225 50R15 and 205 55R15. A local shop helped me find these for the front Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 (205 55R15) and these for the rear Yokohama ADVAN A052 (225 50R15). Im concerned to get these due to the tread pattern being drastically different. Another shop has Kumho Ecsta 4x KU22 picked out for the front. I would like to have performance summer tires that do not break the bank. If i were to do 215/60R15s all around i was looking at Falken Sincera SN250 A/S (which are not performance) or Vredestein Sprint Classic which i am not sure of. I am a bit at a loss here and would greatly appreciate any advice or help selecting tires as this is not something i am comfortable with given the lack of options at this wheel size.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 81

    Dry

    Ultrac Vorti R +1
    80
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 5 tests8274
    Reviews found online7890

    Ultrac Vorti R: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 78.3 = 81

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 89.9 = 80

  2. 78

    Wet

    Ultrac Vorti R +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests8078
    Reviews found online7667

    Ultrac Vorti R: 60% × 79.6 + 40% × 75.6 = 78

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 77.8 + 40% × 67 = 73

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 73

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 71

    Comfort

    Ultrac Vorti R +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6374
    Reviews found online7663

    Ultrac Vorti R: 40% × 63 + 60% × 75.5 = 71

    ADVAN A052: 40% × 74.1 + 60% × 62.6 = 67

  5. 70

    Noise

    ADVAN A052 +7
    77
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 1 tests7377
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)77

    Ultrac Vorti R: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 76.5 = 77

    No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac Vorti R. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Ultrac Vorti R +22
    50
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online7540

    Ultrac Vorti R: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72

    ADVAN A052: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 39.5 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Vorti R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN A052. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN A052 +6
    84
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Reviews found online7884
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests52–
Scores at a glance
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs Yokohama ADVAN A052: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryVredestein Ultrac Vorti RYokohama ADVAN A052
Relative Score 77 72
Dry 81 80
Wet 78 73
Snow – 73
Comfort 71 67
Noise 70 77
Treadwear 72 50
Handling (owners) 78 84
Efficiency 52 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Ultrac Vorti R

± 5

ADVAN A052

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryUltrac Vorti RADVAN A052ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 96% #5/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 93% #5/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #3/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 99% #4/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 80% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 89% #6/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 97% #2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 67% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 91% #2/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 70% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #5/9 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test #4/5 2026 AutoBild Track Day Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ultrac Vorti R

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and handling precision
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
  • Strong road feedback and stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • Wet weather performance can feel less secure at high power outputs
  • Noticeable loss of traction as the tread depth approaches the wear limit
  • May struggle to manage torque delivery on high-horsepower front-wheel-drive vehicles
All owner themes in the Ultrac Vorti R review

Tire B ADVAN A052

Pros

  • Class-leading dry grip and traction, often compared to dedicated racing slicks.
  • Rapid warm-up time, providing peak performance almost immediately.
  • Surprisingly high levels of wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance for a performance tire.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used on heavy vehicles or without aggressive camber settings.
  • Tendency to 'grease up' or lose performance during long, high-intensity track sessions.
  • Soft sidewall construction can lead to vague steering feel or 'sponginess' compared to stiffer competitors.
All owner themes in the ADVAN A052 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Positive

The community regards the Yokohama ADVAN A052 as a top-tier, high-performance competition tire that offers exceptional dry grip and competitive edge in autocross and track settings. Users frequently compare them favorably against other extreme performance tires like the Bridgestone RE-71R/RE-71RS, though questions remain regarding their longevity for long-distance road trips.

Top themes
#exceptional dry grip#autocross and track performance#tire longevity and wear#comparison with bridgestone#tire sizing and fitment

Based on 12 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R B · Yokohama ADVAN A052
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available461
Rim diameters19″ – 21″13″ – 20″
Tread depth—7/32″
UTQG—200 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R

Yokohama ADVAN A052

Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R — better treadwear, wet and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN A052 if noise and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R scores 72 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 77 vs 70 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN A052 scores 84 vs 78 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R scores 78 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN A052

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ultrac Vorti R or ADVAN A052?

Which is better in the wet, Ultrac Vorti R or ADVAN A052?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R, 78 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ultrac Vorti R or ADVAN A052?

Neither, by our numbers: 81 vs 80 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Ultrac Vorti R or ADVAN A052?

Yokohama ADVAN A052, 77 vs 70 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ultrac Vorti R or ADVAN A052?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ultrac Vorti R or ADVAN A052?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R, 72 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology