Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis FK510 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,186 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”

Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 16 in 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (wear)

“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Level
    74
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7773
    Reviews found online6976
    Dry Braking (% of best)97%70%
    Dry Handling (% of best)99%98%
  2. 68

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +15
    83
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7087
    Reviews found online6577
    Wet Braking (% of best)87%99%
    Wet Handling (% of best)95%99%
  3. 36

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +19
    55
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online1445
  4. 63

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +11
    52
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)6242
    Reviews found online6468
  5. 69

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7467
    Reviews found online6168
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7472
    Reviews found online6157
  7. 71

    Handling

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 74 74
Wet 68 83
Snow 36 55
Comfort 63 52
Noise 69 68
Treadwear 69 66
Handling 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ADVAN Fleva V701

Azenis FK510

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN Fleva V701Azenis FK510ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 70% #9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 +27.2 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 98% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +1.1 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 87% #7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test −5.0 Different tests
Noise Other 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #5/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test +0.3 Different tests
Price Other 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 84% #5/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test −13.3 Different tests
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Other 85% #2/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires +30.8 Same test
Value Other 57% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 74% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −17.3 Same test
Wear Other 71% #9/20 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 97% #3/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test −26.3 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 6% #16/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout 20% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test −13.8 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 95% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test −2.5 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 77% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test −21.5 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Same test
Wet Braking Wet 87% #19/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #4/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −11.7 Same test
Wet Handling Wet 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test −4.5 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available7093
Rim diameters15″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG300 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Falken Azenis FK510

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better snow and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 63 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 66 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Narrow edge

Azenis FK510

Amazon