Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 494 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Sport V105 is ahead, 68–55
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 559 reviews
“Gouge on sidewall It’s a continental cross contact LX sport 235/65 R18. Got them last year but hit a sharp curb the other day. Not sure if I’m seeing any cords, there’s some white streaks deep in the gouge but it all seems in tact. Just need to drive this car for 3 more days, is it safe?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
ADVAN Sport V105 +1459Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 74 54 -
72
Wet
ADVAN Sport V105 +1161Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 72 58 -
60
Snow
Level60Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 54 54 -
68
Comfort
ADVAN Sport V105 +563Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 67 58 -
58
Noise
CrossContact LX Sport +664Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) 54 – Reviews found online 65 61 -
67
Treadwear
ADVAN Sport V105 +2443Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 62 27 -
71
Handling
ADVAN Sport V105 +2447Why this score
Source ADVAN Sport V105 CrossContact LX Sport Reviews found online 71 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 55 |
| Dry | 73 | 59 |
| Wet | 72 | 61 |
| Snow | 60 | 60 |
| Comfort | 68 | 63 |
| Noise | 58 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 43 |
| Handling | 71 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
ADVAN Sport V105
55
/ 100
CrossContact LX Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ADVAN Sport V105
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
- Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
- Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
- Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
- Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
Tire B CrossContact LX Sport
Pros
- Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
- Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
- Confident performance in light snow and winter weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
- Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
- Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Community opinions on the Continental CrossContact LX Sport are mixed, with some owners praising their handling, quiet ride, and role as OEM equipment, while others report disappointment, premature wear, and sidewall durability issues. They are frequently compared to newer alternatives like the Hankook iON evo AS SUV and Michelin CrossClimate2, particularly in EV efficiency discussions.
r/crv
·3 upvotes ·2026-04-30
“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”
r/VWatlas
·3 upvotes ·2019-10-07
“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”
r/ModelX
·1 upvote ·2026-09-18
“You don’t want to be too cheap with harder rubber material because they lack stability. I just replaced mine with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport T1 from America Tires with the best balance between comfort and control. Slightly cheaper than Tesla Service Center. You can try the Hankook Evo ION designed specifically for EV but you only have half the warranty mileage due to staggered tires configuration on the MX.”
Top themes
#OEM Equipment Quality#EV Efficiency and Range#Wear and Durability Issues#Road Noise and Handling#Tire Comparisons
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 13 | 32 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 240 A A | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
55
/ 100
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the Continental CrossContact LX Sport if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 67 vs 43 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 71 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 73 vs 59 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.
Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.