Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 27 road tests and 500 + 6,667 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 S is ahead, 83–69

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Sport V105

Summer

± 5

Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 500 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4 S

Summer

± 4

Tests 81 · 27 tests Owners 86 · 6,667 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2021 Auto Bild 19 inch Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“A note about the pilot sport 4 S: in cold weather (below 5 degrees) even if it isn't icy, the tyre compound hardens and has dramatically reduced grip. They are excellent summer tyres though, good in the wet too. These days I run Uniroyal rainsport 5 and they're very good.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 S +20
    93
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 25 tests7395
    Reviews found online7392
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–192%98%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–198%99%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73 = 73

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 94.6 + 40% × 91.5 = 93

  2. 72

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 S +16
    88
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 26 tests7286
    Reviews found online7291
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–094%94%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–188%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–099%98%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 90.5 = 88

  3. 60

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online53–

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 60

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 S +12
    78
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 68 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6584

    ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 40% × 70.4 + 60% × 83.5 = 78

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 59

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 S +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 20 tests5370
    Reviews found online67≈ 66 (est.)
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–197%100%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 59

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 S +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7070
    Reviews found online6175
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–062%62%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66

    Pilot Sport 4 S: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 74.8 = 72

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 S +18
    90
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Reviews found online7290
  8. 58

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 4 S +14
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 23 tests5872
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–185%93%
Scores at a glance
Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Sport V105Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Relative Score 69 83
Dry 73 93
Wet 72 88
Snow 60 –
Comfort 66 78
Noise 59 69
Treadwear 66 72
Handling (owners) 72 90
Efficiency 58 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ADVAN Sport V105

± 4

Pilot Sport 4 S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 3 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 finished ahead 0 times and Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S 3 times.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN Sport V105Pilot Sport 4 SΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 92% 98% −6.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Dry Handling Dry 98% 99% −0.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 94% 94% +0.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Wet Braking Wet 88% 100% −11.8 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Wet Handling Wet 99% 98% +1.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Noise Noise 97% 100% −2.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 62% 62% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% 93% −8.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 57% 45% +11.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Overall Ranking Overall #16/22 #1/22 – 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Sport V105

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
  • Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
  • Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
  • Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport V105 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4 S

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and predictable handling in both dry and wet conditions
  • Noticeable reduction in road noise and improved ride comfort compared to competitors and run-flats
  • Sharper steering response and improved cornering stability

Cons

  • High initial purchase price
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive drivers and track users
  • Soft sidewalls can cause a slightly vague or laggy initial response during rapid steering transitions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 S review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.

Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance

Based on 7 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S as a benchmark max-performance summer tire, praising its outstanding dry and wet grip, stability, and daily driving refinement. Common criticisms focus on its premium price, rapid tread wear on high-powered heavy vehicles or hot track sessions, and significantly reduced grip in cold weather. Many enthusiasts consider it an ideal street tire, though some note softer sidewalls compared to predecessors or recommend dedicated track tires for hard circuit driving.

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Track day durability#High price vs alternatives#Tread life and wear#Cold weather performance#Sidewall stiffness and comfort

Based on 208 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available144110
Rim diameters16″ – 23″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG240 A A300 A - AA A
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common7575

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 93 vs 73 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 90 vs 72 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 88 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S scores 72 vs 58 on efficiency.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 88 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 93 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 69 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 78 vs 66 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ADVAN Sport V105 or Pilot Sport 4 S?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, 72 vs 58 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology