tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 4 road tests and 497 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Sport V105 leads, 68–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Sport V105

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 497 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7378
    Reviews found online7467

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73.5 = 73

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.3 = 74

  2. 72

    Wet

    ADVAN Sport V105 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7270
    Reviews found online7264

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72 + 40% × 72.4 = 72

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 64 = 68

  3. 60

    Snow

    ADVAN Sport V105 +25
    35
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 49 (est.)
    Reviews found online5413

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 60

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 49.1 (est.) + 40% × 12.7 = 35

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    ADVAN Sport V105 +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)62
    Reviews found online6662

    ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.5 + 60% × 61.5 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 59

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 1 tests5375
    Reviews found online6760

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.1 + 40% × 67.3 = 59

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.8 + 40% × 60.1 = 69

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7075
    Reviews found online6159
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–162%85%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 59.4 = 69

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7272
  8. 59

    Efficiency

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +12
    71
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests5971
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Sport V105Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 68 65
Dry 73 74
Wet 72 68
Snow 60 35
Comfort 67 62
Noise 59 69
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 72 72
Efficiency 59 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ADVAN Sport V105

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 1 times.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN Sport V105ADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 62% 85% −23.1 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #16/22 #6/22 – 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Sport V105

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
  • Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
  • Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
  • Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport V105 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.

northamericanmotoring.com

“Advan Sport V105 does get a good tirerack review: Comes in 205/55-16 (three models. Mercedes W and V speed rated and 2010 Production) $83-86 each Not as comfortable or quiet as other Max Summer tires but handles well in both dry and wet. If you prefer to keep the 205/50-16 tire size then for street use and daily driving with a slightly higher budget: Michelin Premier A/S Grand Touring All Season $132 each 640 treadwear, V speed rated, 19 lbs. Tirerack test result- Good blend of comfort and handling with much longer treadlife.”
r/WRX ·1 upvote ·2020-03-08

“I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance

Based on 7 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
alltrac.net ·2025-04-09

“Online reviews in general are such a crapshoot. So many times you see products with diametrically opposed opinions. It's tough to sift through to figure out what may be true for your own application/situation. I'm sure part of the reason less people buy the Vredestein is brand recognition. Like underscore...I would say I've never heard of them...other than that I have seen their brand as I've been looking for tires to go on my 15" OZ rally wheels. They had a tire in an uncommon 215-50-15. Since you have first hand experience that is positive, that's probably worth more than 99% of online reviews. I'll probably go with Yokohama Advan Fleva v701 in 205-55-15 eventually. I've seen glowing reviews for them and reviews that say they are garbage. I'd like to get Yokohama Advan HF Type-D for their period correctness, and because I just think they look cool ( and isn't that what's most important in a tire? ) ...but they are difficult to get in the States. Well, maybe not difficult, just costly. When I looked on Nengun, it was about $650 for shipping on a set of 4. Most UK & European suppliers I've found won't even ship them to the US. But I'm getting way off topic here.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available14470
Rim diameters16″ – 23″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG240 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common4646

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 — better snow, comfort and wet. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if efficiency, noise and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 60 vs 35 on snow.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 59 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 59 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 67 vs 62 on comfort.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 72 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 60 vs 35 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 67 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ADVAN Sport V105 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 59 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology