tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 4 + 31 road tests and 500 + 912 owner reviews. How we score

Azenis FK510 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Azenis FK510 or ADVAN Sport V105 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Tire AYokohama

ADVAN Sport V105

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 4 tests Owners 67 · 500 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Tread Life on the Yokohama Advan Sport V105 I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 5

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 912 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

Key facts

  • In 3 tests that measured dry braking for both, ADVAN Sport V105 won 1 and Azenis FK510 won 2 (average 93% vs 94% of the best).
  • In 3 tests that measured wet braking for both, ADVAN Sport V105 won 0 and Azenis FK510 won 3 (average 88% vs 98% of the best).
  1. 73

    Dry

    Level
    73
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 28 tests7373
    Reviews found online7374
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 1–293%94%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%96%
    Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–160%80%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 73 = 73

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 74.2 = 73

  2. 72

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +12
    84
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 29 tests7288
    Reviews found online7278
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 1–195%95%
    Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–080%80%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 3 shared tests · wins 0–388%98%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 78 = 84

  3. 60

    Snow

    ADVAN Sport V105 +5
    55
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5345

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 60

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 55

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    ADVAN Sport V105 +10
    56
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 68 (est.)40
    Reviews found online6567

    ADVAN Sport V105: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.2 = 66

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 40.1 + 60% × 66.9 = 56

    No road tests of comfort for ADVAN Sport V105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 59

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +7
    66
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 18 tests5366
    Reviews found online6767
    Noise (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–298%99%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 53.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 59

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 = 66

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 5 tests7073
    Reviews found online6154
    Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–062%54%

    ADVAN Sport V105: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.8 = 66

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online7272
  8. 58

    Efficiency

    ADVAN Sport V105 +8
    50
    Why this score
    SourceADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 19 tests5850
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–185%90%
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama ADVAN Sport V105Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 68 70
Dry 73 73
Wet 72 84
Snow 60 55
Comfort 66 56
Noise 59 66
Treadwear 66 66
Handling (owners) 72 72
Efficiency 58 50

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ADVAN Sport V105

± 5

Azenis FK510

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 8 tests that ran both, Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 finished ahead 1 times and Falken Azenis FK510 7 times.

DisciplineCategoryADVAN Sport V105Azenis FK510ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% 94% −0.9 1–2 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Dry Handling Dry 98% 96% +2.1 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 60% 80% −20.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 95% 95% −0.2 1–1 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Wet Braking Wet 88% 98% −10.0 0–3 in 3 shared tests Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 98% 99% −1.2 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 80% 80% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17
Noise Noise 98% 99% −1.6 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Treadwear 62% 54% +7.6 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% 90% −5.3 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 57% 74% −17.5 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test · 265/35 R19
Overall Ranking Overall #16/22 #5/22 – 1–7 in 8 shared tests Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ADVAN Sport V105

Pros

  • Outstanding grip and traction in both dry and wet road conditions
  • Sharp, responsive steering feel and high cornering stability
  • Competitive pricing offering great value relative to flagship alternatives

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly under spirited or track driving
  • Noticeable road noise on certain vehicles or rough road surfaces
  • Subpar performance and lack of confidence in snow and freezing temperatures
All owner themes in the ADVAN Sport V105 review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed impressions regarding the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, highlighting both praise for its wet and dry handling along with debates surrounding its tread life. While some drivers report surprisingly durable treadwear and good overall value, others cite reports of poor tread life and note that ride comfort and road noise may trail competitor offerings.

northamericanmotoring.com

“Advan Sport V105 does get a good tirerack review: Comes in 205/55-16 (three models. Mercedes W and V speed rated and 2010 Production) $83-86 each Not as comfortable or quiet as other Max Summer tires but handles well in both dry and wet. If you prefer to keep the 205/50-16 tire size then for street use and daily driving with a slightly higher budget: Michelin Premier A/S Grand Touring All Season $132 each 640 treadwear, V speed rated, 19 lbs. Tirerack test result- Good blend of comfort and handling with much longer treadlife.”
r/WRX ·1 upvote ·2020-03-08

“I’ve seen lots of posts both on here, and various forums about poor tread life on the stock STi tyres, the Yokohama Advan Sport V105. I made a little video checking the tread around the vehicle and I’ve found so far this is fantastic, 10,000kms in and still with more than 7mm of tread on all four corners. Really interested to know what you’re all getting out of your stock tyres, and if you’ve changed these to anything else? I’m looking at the Michelin PS4S as the next set.”
Top themes
#tread life longevity#dry and wet handling#comparison to Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and noise#OEM fitment evaluation#daily driving performance

Based on 7 community posts

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”
r/Autocross ·1 upvote ·2023-12-18

“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”
corvetteforum.com

“I've had a set of Falken Azenis FK510's on my car for a couple of months now, and just this past weekend took a trip through the twisties up to Prescott, and pushed the car as hard as I could heading up the mountain. I was a little nervous as I'd never used Falken tires before, but trusted in Tire Rack's reviews of them and pushed the envelope in every turn I hit. It was a pleasant surprise to find that the tires were gripping just as well as the much more expensive Michelin tires they'd replaced, and I even hit a personal best of .95g going around one of the more nasty turns. During this entire drive I never felt once like the tires weren't gripping perfectly, or that I was going to lose control from them breaking loose. Road noise is pretty much non-existent, and they seem to run pretty smooth over every surface I've driven them on so far. All-in-all I don't regret my purchase one bit, and if their longevity is anything like what I got out of my previous set of Michelins I'll definitely be buying another set once this one is done for.”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available14493
Rim diameters16″ – 23″17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG240 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common8181

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105

Falken Azenis FK510

Narrow edge: Falken Azenis FK510 — better wet and noise. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 if comfort, efficiency and snow matter most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 84 vs 72 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 66 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105 scores 58 vs 50 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 59 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 84 vs 72 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 60 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 66 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 66 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

Which rolls more easily, ADVAN Sport V105 or Azenis FK510?

Yokohama ADVAN Sport V105, 58 vs 50 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology