Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 81 reviews
Yokohama AVID Ascend vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 81 + 1,647 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 1,647 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +475Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 73 77 AVID Ascend: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 71
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 76.6 = 75
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
75
Wet
AVID Ascend +273Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 77 79 AVID Ascend: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 76.6 = 75
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 79 = 73
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
Geolandar A/T G015 +1275Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 58 73 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 63
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 73.4 = 75
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
71
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +374Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 73 76 AVID Ascend: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 72.5 = 71
Geolandar A/T G015: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 76.4 = 74
No road tests of comfort for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Geolandar A/T G015 +776Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 74 77 AVID Ascend: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 69
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 77.4 = 76
No road tests of noise for AVID Ascend. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Geolandar A/T G015 +573Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 68 77 AVID Ascend: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 68
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +173Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 72 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison57Why this score
Source AVID Ascend Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID Ascend | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 74 |
| Dry | 71 | 75 |
| Wet | 75 | 73 |
| Snow | 63 | 75 |
| Comfort | 71 | 74 |
| Noise | 69 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVID Ascend
Geolandar A/T G015
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID Ascend
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and quiet ride
- High level of ride comfort and shock absorption
- Strong wet and dry traction, inspiring confidence in heavy rain
Cons
- Isolated reports of premature tread wear or not meeting expected mileage
- Slightly spongy initial feel requiring a brief break-in period
- Occasional minor wheel slip during hard acceleration in wet or dry conditions
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama AVID Ascend
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Most owners praise the Geolandar A/T G015 as a quiet, comfortable all-terrain that works well on highways, in heavy rain and in snow. It also holds up well off-road and in light trails, and it looks good. Complaints include a harsh or stiff ride on some vehicles such as the Outback, road noise, soft sidewalls and a squirrely feel when towing, picking up pebbles in the tread, and a 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss.
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
“Tires RFID Tags I’ve been looking for a set of Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 tires and contacted several shops while also checking prices online. I was surprised by how much the prices varied between sellers. I then contacted Juma Al Majid, which I think is the official dealer in the UAE. Their price was one of the highest I found. When I mentioned that I had found significantly cheaper options elsewhere, they asked me what prices I have found. After I shared the price range, they seemed surprised and advised me to make sure the tires had RFID tags. After looking into it, I understood that these tags are related to tire identification and compliance with UAE requirements. So, Are tires without RFID tags potentially less suitable for UAE conditions or more prone to damage? Or could they be essentially the same tires, with the price difference simply reflecting different sourcing, importation, or compliance costs? Read more”
“I just put the G015 's on 2018 Outback . The harsh ride hurts my wife's back. I will trade them in for something that is mostly for a smooth ride. It's funny, I put the LT version on my Expedition and it's great. I suppose the shock valving is way different between the 2 vehicles. I just hope Yokohama 's 30 day trial is for real.”
Based on 32 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID Ascend | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 12/32″ | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A | 360 - 600 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 75,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID Ascend
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Narrow edge: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better snow, noise and treadwear. Where the Yokohama AVID Ascend is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 63 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 76 vs 69 on noise.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 73 vs 68 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 63 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 76 vs 69 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 74 vs 71 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AVID Ascend or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 73 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology