Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Kumho Solus HA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Solus HA31 is ahead, 71–66

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 73 · 18 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Solus HA31 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–64
    Reviews found online6672
  2. 67

    Wet

    Solus HA31 +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–75
    Reviews found online6678
  3. 62

    Snow

    Solus HA31 +9
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–66
    Reviews found online5778
  4. 68

    Comfort

    Solus HA31 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Reviews found online6673
  5. 67

    Noise

    Solus HA31 +4
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–72
    Reviews found online6870
  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Solus HA31 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online6867
  7. 64

    Handling

    Solus HA31 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus HA31
    Reviews found online6473
Scores at a glance
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Kumho Solus HA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama AVID TOURING-SKumho Solus HA31
Relative Score 66 71
Dry 66 67
Wet 67 76
Snow 62 71
Comfort 68 71
Noise 67 71
Treadwear 67 70
Handling 64 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

AVID TOURING-S

Solus HA31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S B · Kumho Solus HA31
Category—All Season
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2829
Rim diameters15″ – 17″13″ – 18″
Tread depth11/32″10/32″
UTQG620 A B420 A A
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi—
SidewallWhitewallBlackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Kumho Solus HA31

Winner: Kumho Solus HA31 — better wet, snow and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 76 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 71 vs 62 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 73 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 71 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Tire B · Kumho Solus HA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Leads

Solus HA31

Amazon