tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Kumho Solus TA71 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 85 + 38 owner reviews. How we score

AVID TOURING-S is ahead, 67–51

Check price on Amazon · AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus TA71
Tire BKumho

Solus TA71

Premium Touring All Season tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 38 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    AVID TOURING-S +19
    48
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6737

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    Solus TA71: 60% × 54.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.8 = 48

    No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 68

    Wet

    AVID TOURING-S +18
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online6742

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 68

    Solus TA71: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 42.4 = 50

    No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 63

    Snow

    AVID TOURING-S +11
    52
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online5940

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 63

    Solus TA71: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.4 = 52

    No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 67

    Comfort

    AVID TOURING-S +20
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6636

    AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68.6 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    Solus TA71: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 35.6 = 47

    No road tests of comfort for AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    AVID TOURING-S +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6948

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.9 = 68

    Solus TA71: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 59

    No road tests of noise for AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    AVID TOURING-S +13
    56
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7049

    AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69

    Solus TA71: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA71. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    36
    Why this score
    SourceAVID TOURING-SSolus TA71
    Reviews found online–36
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama AVID TOURING-SKumho Solus TA71
Relative Score 67 51
Dry 67 48
Wet 68 50
Snow 63 52
Comfort 67 47
Noise 68 59
Treadwear 69 56
Handling (owners) – 36

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

AVID TOURING-S

± 8

Solus TA71

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Solus TA71

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong tread life longevity

Cons

  • Occasional reports of vague steering or 'wandering' feel
  • Mushy cornering stability during aggressive maneuvers
  • Inconsistent wet-weather traction for some users
All owner themes in the Solus TA71 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S B · Kumho Solus TA71
CategoryAll-Season tirePremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available285
Rim diameters15″ – 17″17″ – 19″
Tread depth11/32″11.5/32″
UTQG620 A B600 A A
Treadwear warranty80,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallWhitewallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Kumho Solus TA71

Winner: Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 67 vs 47 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 67 vs 48 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 68 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 69 vs 56 on treadwear.

Tire A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA71
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Which is better in the wet, AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 68 vs 50 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 67 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 63 vs 52 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 68 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 67 vs 47 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, AVID TOURING-S or Solus TA71?

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 69 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology