Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 85 reviews
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Michelin Primacy 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Primacy 4 is ahead, 78–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 23 tests Owners 74 · 13,367 reviews
“Rapid wear on Michelin Primacy 4, 2017 Forester 2017 Forester in Mexico City, where there are lots of potholes and speed bumps and a LOT of rain. I got a set of Michelin Primacy 4+ tires at Costco three years ago and they've got about 30,000 kms -- 16,000 miles on them. Tread is down to about 3.5/32nds (in the middle, slightly less at the sides). The original Geolandars lasted very far beyond that in the same conditions. I'm getting a bit antsy at the tread depth. Wonder if anybody else has seen such rapid wear.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Primacy 4 +1480Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 66 74 -
67
Wet
Primacy 4 +1481Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 66 76 -
62
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Reviews found online 57 – -
68
Comfort
Primacy 4 +876Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 66 74 -
67
Noise
Primacy 4 +572Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 68 – -
67
Treadwear
Primacy 4 +1077Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 68 71 -
64
Handling
Primacy 4 +1074Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Reviews found online 64 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 78 |
| Dry | 66 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 81 |
| Snow | 62 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 76 |
| Noise | 67 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 77 |
| Handling | 64 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
AVID TOURING-S
Primacy 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID TOURING-S
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Primacy 4
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
- Low road noise and a very quiet, comfortable ride
- Reliable and consistent wet and dry grip
Cons
- Vague, numb, or floaty steering feel with soft sidewalls under hard cornering
- High price point compared to competitors
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or harsher ride as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Primacy 4
Community sentiment towards the Michelin Primacy 4 is generally positive, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfort, and dependable wet and dry braking performance. Several owners note impressive longevity reaching over 50,000 to 70,000 km, though some EV and SUV drivers report accelerated wear and fragile sidewalls over rough terrain. It is commonly viewed as a premium touring tire that commands high prices compared to competitors.
“I have on my BMW E87 118d Primacy 4 since 2020 and I think I have covered about 30k km with them and I can certainly cover another 5-10k km with them but the DOT is 2019 so I am changing them next year. I thought I would buy new ones this year, but I gave up because I will soon put on winter ones, so I will buy new summer ones next year. I am delighted with the Primacy 4, excellent and safe in the rain and in the dry, especially in the rain, I literally drive as if it were dry, that's how safe I feel, and I honestly drive a little faster and more aggressively. It is 205 55 R16 and the tires are made in Spain.”
“Well my answer is none of the above. You choose, they are all a lottery imo. I just bought some Michelin Primacy 4 for mine today. Size 215/55 R18”
“Michelin Primacy 4 or Conti UC6 - Virtus GT Hey, i recently got a Virtus GT with stock Apollo alnac 4g tyres - looking to upgrade them. As per ChatGPT my options are Michelin Primacy 4 and Continental UC6 - budget is not really a problem. Overall i want good grip, handling, comfort and low cabin noise. Not going for Pilot Sport 4, because don't want to compromise on comfort for performance when i am not going to push my car too much, hence PS4 is a no no. But read it somewhere that with Primacy 4, there is a noticeable difference in mileage not sure if it means going up or down. Need recommendations on what i should get! Thanks in advance”
Based on 44 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 28 | 57 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 620 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Whitewall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Michelin Primacy 4
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 80 vs 66 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 67 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 77 vs 67 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.