Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 85 reviews
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Michelin Primacy 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Primacy 4 is ahead, 78–66
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 82 · 23 tests Owners 74 · 13,344 reviews
“Gomme alternative a Primacy 4 Buongiorno, ho una Peugeot 208 del 2020 con delle Michelin Primacy 4 205/45 R 17 88 V, le ho da 4 anni, circa 20000km all’anno tranne quest’anno che non le ho sostituite con le invernali e che quindi dovrei portarle ad usura completa con il prossimo “giro” delle gomme per altri 20000km. In totale arriverò a quasi 100000km, quindi super ammortizzate e le consiglierei sempre anche per la tenuta. Visto che entro fine estate pensavo di sostituirle tutte e quattro, vorrei capire se ci fossero delle alternative un più economiche ma altrettanto valide (un cambio gomme al momento mi costa circa €650-700). Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Primacy 4 +1480Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 66 74 -
67
Wet
Primacy 4 +1481Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 66 77 -
62
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Reviews found online 57 – -
68
Comfort
Primacy 4 +876Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 66 74 -
67
Noise
Primacy 4 +471Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 68 – -
67
Treadwear
Primacy 4 +1077Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 68 71 -
64
Handling
Primacy 4 +1074Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Primacy 4 Reviews found online 64 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 78 |
| Dry | 66 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 81 |
| Snow | 62 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 76 |
| Noise | 67 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 77 |
| Handling | 64 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
AVID TOURING-S
Primacy 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID TOURING-S
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Primacy 4
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability
- Low road noise and a very quiet, comfortable ride
- Reliable and consistent wet and dry grip
Cons
- Vague, numb, or floaty steering feel with soft sidewalls under hard cornering
- High price point compared to competitors
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or harsher ride as the tread wears down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin Primacy 4
Community feedback for the Michelin Primacy 4 is largely positive, highlighting its excellent balance of low road noise, high comfort, dependable wet and dry grip, and strong longevity for daily driving. While some users note concerns over rapid wear on specific heavy or EV applications, and poor snow performance due to its summer tire nature, most drivers find it a superior touring tire compared to factory options.
“Had a shop install two new Michelin Primacy 4 in the front of my W124 yesterday. On the way back home i checked the pressure and the right one was a little on the low side. Drove the car today and after a few kms of city driving i noticed it was steering itself to the right once i was out of the stop and go traffic. Got out of the car and the tire was almost flat. I put 2.7 bar in it at the first station but noticed the sidewall is now damaged and there's a buldge... How is this possible? It is wet and i can hear the sound of air coming out of the tire but can't identify where it comes from. If the rim is the problem, why did they install the tire without noticing me first? If they don't admit their fault and blame it on the rim, i'm going to have to buy a new tire...”
“I have Primacy 4s on my Volvo wagon. I've been very pleased. Plenty of grip, low road noise and longevity.”
“I've been using primacy 4 for 5 years, great tires, dry, rain, great, but I see that my front ones are a little cracked and now my car often activate the abs when braking suddenly, the pattern is good, it has depth, they are not worn that much, but I believe that they are cracked a little because of the heat, because in the summer the temperatures are over 40 degrees Celsius, and this will be my fifth summer of using them, so I will replace them.”
Based on 32 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | B · Michelin Primacy 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 28 | 57 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 620 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Whitewall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Michelin Primacy 4
Winner: Michelin Primacy 4 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 80 vs 66 on dry.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 81 vs 67 on wet.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 77 vs 67 on treadwear.
Michelin Primacy 4 scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.