Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 85 reviews
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S vs Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 85 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: AVID TOURING-S and Geolandar H/T G056 are level at 67.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Geolandar H/T G056 +471Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 66 73 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 67
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.1 = 71
No road tests of dry for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
68
Wet
Geolandar H/T G056 +270Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 70 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of wet for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
63
Snow
AVID TOURING-S +558Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 58 50 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 63
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 49.8 = 58
No road tests of snow for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
66
Comfort
Geolandar H/T G056 +369Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 65 69 AVID TOURING-S: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.4 = 66
Geolandar H/T G056: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
Geolandar H/T G056 +168Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 72 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 68
No road tests of noise for AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
AVID TOURING-S +564Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 70 63 AVID TOURING-S: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69
Geolandar H/T G056: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for AVID TOURING-S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar H/T G056. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison68Why this score
Source AVID TOURING-S Geolandar H/T G056 Reviews found online – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 67 |
| Dry | 67 | 71 |
| Wet | 68 | 70 |
| Snow | 63 | 58 |
| Comfort | 66 | 69 |
| Noise | 67 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
AVID TOURING-S
Geolandar H/T G056
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A AVID TOURING-S
Pros
- Good value: many reviewers cite a low price relative to quality and describe it as a credible, cheaper alternative to Michelin and other name brands.
- Quiet, smooth, and comfortable ride, mentioned very frequently, including by reviewers who expected a loud tire.
- Long tread life: reports include about 65,000 miles on a Subaru Outback, about 80,000 miles per set over three sets, and minimal wear after 5,000 to 10,000 miles.
Cons
- Some reviewers report wheelspin or weak traction when starting from a stop in wet or snowy conditions.
- Noise is mentioned by several reviewers, including tread growl, a louder tire than their previous set, and a tire described as 'so noisy'.
- Soft sidewall or tire feel: one reviewer described vague steering and flexing, another called the tire 'soft' and noted tracking in pavement grooves on some highways.
Tire B Geolandar H/T G056
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry pavement handling and stability
- Impressive tread longevity for many users
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in wet and snowy conditions
- Reports of premature tread wear in heavy-duty or high-torque applications
- Occasional complaints regarding road noise or 'growling' sounds as the tire ages
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S | B · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 28 | 56 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 620 A B | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Whitewall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056
Too close to call: Yokohama AVID TOURING-S and Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama AVID TOURING-S is stronger on snow and treadwear. Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 is stronger on dry and comfort.
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 63 vs 58 on snow.
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 71 vs 67 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056 scores 69 vs 66 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Which is better in the wet, AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 71 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 63 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Yokohama Geolandar H/T G056, 69 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, AVID TOURING-S or Geolandar H/T G056?
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology