Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 118 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 118 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Parada Spec-2 +373Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 71 75 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +1161Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 73 58 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
72
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +765Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 62 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +362Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Parada Spec-2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 65 59 BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65
Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
73
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +469Why this score
Source BluEarth Es ES32 Parada Spec-2 Reviews found online 73 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 66 |
| Dry | 70 | 73 |
| Wet | 72 | 61 |
| Comfort | 72 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 73 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
BluEarth Es ES32
Parada Spec-2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Tire B Parada Spec-2
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
- Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
- Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
- Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 | B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 64 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if dry matters most to you.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.
Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?
Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama Parada Spec-2, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology