Yokohama Parada Spec-2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 60 + 118 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Parada Spec-2 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7175

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7358

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 72

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7462

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 72

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Parada Spec-2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6559

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 65

    Parada Spec-2: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Parada Spec-2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  5. 73

    Handling (owners)

    BluEarth Es ES32 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceBluEarth Es ES32Parada Spec-2
    Reviews found online7369
Scores at a glance
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 vs Yokohama Parada Spec-2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryYokohama BluEarth Es ES32Yokohama Parada Spec-2
Relative Score 70 66
Dry 70 73
Wet 72 61
Comfort 72 65
Treadwear 65 62
Handling (owners) 73 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

BluEarth Es ES32

Parada Spec-2

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Tire B Parada Spec-2

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
  • Excellent value for money and aggressive tread design
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable breakaway limits in the dry

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and high risk of aquaplaning
  • Fast tread wear due to the soft rubber compound
  • Noticeable road noise at cruising speeds
All owner themes in the Parada Spec-2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available64—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Yokohama Parada Spec-2

Narrow edge: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Parada Spec-2 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Parada Spec-2 scores 73 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Tire B · Yokohama Parada Spec-2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?

Which is better in the wet, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?

Yokohama Parada Spec-2, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, BluEarth Es ES32 or Parada Spec-2?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology