Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 1 road tests and 1,627 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Tests – · 1 test Owners 76 · 164 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 74 | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 77 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 77.1 = 75
Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 69 | ≈ 75 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 79 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 79.7 = 73
Crugen HT51: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 78.5 = 76
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 70 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 73.4 = 75
Crugen HT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 71 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 71 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 77.4 = 75
Crugen HT51: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar A/T G015 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 80 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 77.9 = 77
Crugen HT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 72
No road tests of noise for Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 70 (est.) | 58 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 76 |
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 75.9 = 72
Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 76.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 74 |
| Source | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 57 | – |
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 72 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 73 | 76 |
| Snow | 75 | 70 |
| Comfort | 75 | 70 |
| Noise | 77 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 74 |
| Efficiency | 57 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Geolandar A/T G015
Crugen HT51
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Geolandar A/T G015 | Crugen HT51 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | #5/13 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“GEOLANDAR A/T G015 Anyone running these on 17" rims, stock or other? I have Enkei M52 rims, 17x7.5 and 45mm offset. What size fits without rubbing? 215/60R17 looks to be the closest, the only other size close is 225/65R17 which I think will be too big without a lift. I am open to other suggestions for off-road capable tires that will mainly be used on-road. K02 is out because they don't fit without rubbing, and I plan to add flaps at some point and do not want to lift the vehicle or get different rims.”
Based on 30 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 90 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 18/32″ | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 360 - 600 A B | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 41 | 41 |
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Kumho Crugen HT51
Narrow edge: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better treadwear, snow and comfort. Pick the Kumho Crugen HT51 if wet matters most to you.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 72 vs 65 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 70 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 70 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 77 vs 72 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Kumho Crugen HT51, 76 vs 73 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 70 on our snow score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 77 vs 72 on our noise score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 72 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
