Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 12 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth vs Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, 60–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 17 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +655Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 57 48 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
58
Wet
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +454Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 53 47 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58
ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 57.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 54
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online – 54 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 60
No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +954Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 60 47 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63
ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 47.1 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 55 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62
No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +2539Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online 63 21 Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64
ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 50.3 (est.) + 40% × 21.1 = 39
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
56
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1442Why this score
Source Geolandar G055 Blue Earth ZIEX ZE001 A/S Reviews found online 56 42
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth | Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 51 |
| Dry | 61 | 55 |
| Wet | 58 | 54 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 63 | 54 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 39 |
| Handling (owners) | 56 | 42 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Tire B ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable dry-road traction and handling
- Satisfactory performance for daily commuting and highway driving
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Poor traction and confidence in snow and icy conditions
- Low hydroplaning resistance in heavy rain
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth | B · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 64 vs 39 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 56 vs 42 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 63 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 61 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?
Which is better in the wet, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 58 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 61 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 63 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Geolandar G055 Blue Earth or ZIEX ZE001 A/S?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 64 vs 39 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology