Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 169 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV vs Kumho Solus KH16 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Geolandar G91AV is ahead, 71–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 34 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Geolandar G91AV +1459Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 76 55 -
68
Wet
Geolandar G91AV +563Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 67 61 -
69
Snow
Geolandar G91AV +1455Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 68 46 -
72
Comfort
Geolandar G91AV +666Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 74 62 -
68
Noise
Geolandar G91AV +266Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 69 64 -
69
Treadwear
Geolandar G91AV +960Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 71 57 -
76
Handling
Geolandar G91AV +1759Why this score
Source Geolandar G91AV Solus KH16 Reviews found online 76 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV | Kumho Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 60 |
| Dry | 73 | 59 |
| Wet | 68 | 63 |
| Snow | 69 | 55 |
| Comfort | 72 | 66 |
| Noise | 68 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 60 |
| Handling | 76 | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Geolandar G91AV
Solus KH16
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Geolandar G91AV
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
- Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting
Cons
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
- Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
- Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
Tire B Solus KH16
Pros
- Low noise levels providing a quiet and comfortable ride
- Good handling and reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions
- Affordable pricing and good overall value compared to original equipment or premium alternatives
Cons
- Some users reported soft sidewalls causing a vague handling sensation
- Occasional reports of rapid tread wear or shorter lifespan under specific conditions
- A few concerns regarding wet weather performance from isolated reviewers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV | B · Kumho Solus KH16 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 B A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Kumho Solus KH16
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better handling, dry and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 76 vs 59 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 73 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 69 vs 55 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 69 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.