tirewheelguide

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 121 owner reviews. How we score

Check price on Amazon · Geolandar H/T G95A Check price on Amazon · Ventus V12 evo K110
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 55.9 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    49
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–36

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.6 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 56.1 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–51

    Ventus V12 evo K110: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo K110. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGeolandar H/T G95AVentus V12 evo K110
    Reviews found online–63
Scores at a glance
CategoryYokohama Geolandar H/T G95AHankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Relative Score – 58
Dry – 60
Wet – 60
Snow – 49
Comfort – 60
Noise – 61
Treadwear – 57
Handling (owners) – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Geolandar H/T G95A

± 7

Ventus V12 evo K110

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Geolandar H/T G95A

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ventus V12 evo K110

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium brand alternatives
  • Strong, confident dry grip and handling performance
  • Low road noise and high comfort levels

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and a squirmy feel
  • Faster-than-average tread wear
  • Subpar wet weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo K110 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—280 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A

Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Only Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Yokohama Geolandar H/T G95A
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology