tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Advanta HPZ-02 vs Nexen N'Fera RU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 5 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

N'Fera RU1 leads, 65–63 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · N'Fera RU1 or HPZ-02 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Advanta HPZ-02
Tire AAdvanta

HPZ-02

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 5 reviews

Nexen N'Fera RU1
Tire BNexen

N'Fera RU1

Summer

± 8

Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    HPZ-02 +4
    59
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 65 (est.)54
    Reviews found online6166

    HPZ-02: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 66 = 59

    No road tests of dry for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    N'Fera RU1 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 68 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6670

    HPZ-02: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 67

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67 + 40% × 70.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 59

    Snow

    N'Fera RU1 +9
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5166

    HPZ-02: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 59

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 68

    No road tests of snow for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    N'Fera RU1 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5863

    HPZ-02: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.7 = 61

    N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.1 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    N'Fera RU1 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6168

    HPZ-02: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 64

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of noise for HPZ-02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    N'Fera RU1 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6167

    HPZ-02: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 63

    N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for HPZ-02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 59

    Handling (owners)

    N'Fera RU1 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Reviews found online5965
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    52
    Why this score
    SourceHPZ-02N'Fera RU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–52
Scores at a glance
CategoryAdvanta HPZ-02Nexen N'Fera RU1
Relative Score 63 65
Dry 63 59
Wet 67 68
Snow 59 68
Comfort 61 65
Noise 64 68
Treadwear 63 67
Handling (owners) 59 65
Efficiency – 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

HPZ-02

± 8

N'Fera RU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A HPZ-02

Pros

  • Fabulous value and affordability for the price point
  • Surprinsingly good dry and wet grip for a standard road tire
  • Sharp handling and competent everyday performance

Cons

  • Durability issues, specifically sidewall bubbling reported on low-profile sizes
  • Potential vibration and structural integrity concerns under certain vehicle setups
All owner themes in the HPZ-02 review

Tire B N'Fera RU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium tier brands
  • High level of ride comfort and impact absorption over rough roads
  • Low road noise and quiet highway cruising

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear or chipping reported by some users
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to reduced steering feedback and vague high-speed handling
  • Mixed performance in colder temperatures or under hard acceleration
All owner themes in the N'Fera RU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Advanta HPZ-02 B · Nexen N'Fera RU1
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available9745
Rim diameters16″ – 24″16″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG420 A A320 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common2424

Which one should you actually buy?

Advanta HPZ-02

Nexen N'Fera RU1

Narrow edge: Nexen N'Fera RU1 — better snow, handling and comfort. Pick the Advanta HPZ-02 if dry matters most to you. Advanta HPZ-02 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 68 vs 59 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Advanta HPZ-02 scores 63 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Advanta HPZ-02
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N'Fera RU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Which is better in the wet, HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Advanta HPZ-02, 63 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 68 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, HPZ-02 or N'Fera RU1?

Nexen N'Fera RU1, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology