Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 1 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison71Why this score
Source 3D Ultra Supersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 72 Angel GT: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 71
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
–
Wet
No comparison74Why this score
Source 3D Ultra Supersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online – 76 Angel GT: 60% × 73.6 (est.) + 40% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Comfort
No comparison71Why this score
Source 3D Ultra Supersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 Angel GT: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.3 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Angel GT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Treadwear
No comparison66Why this score
Source 3D Ultra Supersport Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 66 Angel GT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison72Why this score
Source 3D Ultra Supersport Angel GT Reviews found online – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Avon 3D Ultra Supersport | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 71 |
| Dry | – | 71 |
| Wet | – | 74 |
| Comfort | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | – | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
3D Ultra Supersport
Angel GT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A 3D Ultra Supersport
Pros
- Exceptional grip levels
- Suitable for both road and track use
- High rider satisfaction and brand loyalty
Cons
- Lack of data regarding wet weather performance
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Avon 3D Ultra Supersport | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Extreme Performance tires | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Avon 3D Ultra Supersport
Pirelli Angel GT
Only Pirelli Angel GT has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology