Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 693 owner reviews. How we score

g-Force COMP-2 A/S is ahead, 70–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review

Best test result: #2 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +8
    62
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SVentus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7160

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 62

    No road tests of dry for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +4
    67
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SVentus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7166

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67

    No road tests of wet for g-Force COMP-2 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SVentus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–43

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 43 = 53

    No road tests of snow for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +3
    65
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SVentus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6763

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    Ventus S1 noble2: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 62.9 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Treadwear

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +17
    53
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SVentus S1 noble2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6044

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S: 60% × 77.1 + 40% × 59.6 = 70

    Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 69

    Handling (owners)

    g-Force COMP-2 A/S +6
    63
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SVentus S1 noble2
    Reviews found online6963
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SHankook Ventus S1 noble2
Relative Score 70 62
Dry 70 62
Wet 71 67
Snow – 53
Comfort 68 65
Treadwear 70 53
Handling (owners) 69 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force COMP-2 A/S

± 7

Ventus S1 noble2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Ventus S1 noble2

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness
  • Very low road noise and quiet highway cruising
  • Strong dry traction and responsive handling

Cons

  • Rapid and uneven tread wear, frequently failing to meet mileage expectations
  • Poor traction and dangerous handling in snow, slush, and ice
  • Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering response or 'squishy' cornering feel
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 noble2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 noble2

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its competitive price-to-performance value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Drivers frequently commend its quiet ride, wet grip, and respectable tread life, though some note reduced handling sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires and increased road noise after higher mileage.

Top themes
#value and price affordability#quiet and comfortable ride#treadwear and longevity#wet weather traction#all-season vs summer performance#comparison to premium brands

Based on 36 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—8
Rim diameters—17″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG400 AA A—
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Hankook Ventus S1 noble2

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better treadwear, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 70 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 71 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Ventus S1 noble2?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Ventus S1 noble2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Ventus S1 noble2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Ventus S1 noble2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force COMP-2 A/S or Ventus S1 noble2?

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S, 70 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology