Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 11 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler vs Dunlop SP Sport 560 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 5 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport 560 is ahead, 79–71
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 83 · 5 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
SP Sport 560 +979Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler SP Sport 560 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 75 (est.) Reviews found online 72 84 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70
SP Sport 560: 60% × 75 (est.) + 40% × 84.4 = 79
No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
SP Sport 560 +780Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler SP Sport 560 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 78 (est.) Reviews found online 74 84 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
SP Sport 560: 60% × 77.9 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 80
No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
SP Sport 560 +1178Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler SP Sport 560 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 66 83 g-Force Profiler: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67
SP Sport 560: 40% × 71.7 (est.) + 60% × 83 = 78
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler or SP Sport 560. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
74
Treadwear
SP Sport 560 +276Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler SP Sport 560 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 83 g-Force Profiler: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 79.2 = 74
SP Sport 560: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 82.6 = 76
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 560. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
SP Sport 560 +1683Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler SP Sport 560 Reviews found online 67 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | Dunlop SP Sport 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 79 |
| Dry | 70 | 79 |
| Wet | 73 | 80 |
| Comfort | 67 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 76 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
g-Force Profiler
79
/ 100
SP Sport 560
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Profiler
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip across a range of temperatures
- Impressive tread life and long-lasting durability
- High value for money at an affordable price point
Cons
- Poor traction and handling in heavy snow and winter weather
- Can be noisy on wet tarmac
- Firm or crashy ride quality over rough road surfaces
Tire B SP Sport 560
Pros
- Exceptional value and competitive pricing compared to other premium tires
- Strong performance and grip on dry city roads
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Handling on wet roads can be challenging, though potentially influenced by narrower tire widths
- Limited size and vehicle context availability in early feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler | B · Dunlop SP Sport 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
79
/ 100
Dunlop SP Sport 560
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport 560 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Dunlop SP Sport 560 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 83 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 78 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 79 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Dunlop SP Sport 560 scores 80 vs 73 on wet.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler
Tire B · Dunlop SP Sport 560
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Profiler or SP Sport 560?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler or SP Sport 560?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler or SP Sport 560?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 79 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler or SP Sport 560?
Dunlop SP Sport 560, 78 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler or SP Sport 560?
Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 76 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology