Tests 65 · 1 test Owners 61 · 80 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling long run)
Head-to-head
Updated
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 80 + 453 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE 71RS is ahead, 74–64
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 79 · 3 tests Owners 69 · 453 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Potenza RE 71RS +1684Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 61 78 Reviews found online 78 92 Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 93% 100% Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 100% 100% Dry Handling Long Run (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 100% 100% Dry Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 100% G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 61.1 + 40% × 77.8 = 68
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 91.5 = 84
-
61
Wet
Potenza RE 71RS +1677Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 69 85 Reviews found online 48 67 Wet Handling (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 81% 100% Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 91% 100% Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 96% 100% G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 69.4 + 40% × 48 = 61
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.7 = 77
-
58
Comfort
Potenza RE 71RS +260Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 66 71 Reviews found online 54 52 Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 92% 96% G Force Rival S 1.5: 40% × 65.7 + 60% × 53.6 = 58
Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71 + 60% × 52.2 = 60
-
64
Noise
Potenza RE 71RS +165Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 62 67 Reviews found online ≈ 66 (est.) 63 Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 80% 84% G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 64
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 63.4 = 65
No owner ratings of noise for G Force Rival S 1.5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
60
Treadwear
G Force Rival S 1.5 +258Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Potenza RE 71RS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 55 52 G Force Rival S 1.5: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for G Force Rival S 1.5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
74
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE 71RS +1286Why this score
Source G Force Rival S 1.5 Potenza RE 71RS Reviews found online 74 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 74 |
| Dry | 68 | 84 |
| Wet | 61 | 77 |
| Comfort | 58 | 60 |
| Noise | 64 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
G Force Rival S 1.5
74
/ 100
Potenza RE 71RS
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 finished ahead 0 times and Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | G Force Rival S 1.5 | Potenza RE 71RS | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% | 100% | −6.5 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% | 100% | −0.3 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 91% | 100% | −8.6 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Dry Handling Long Run | Dry | 100% | 100% | −0.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% | 100% | −8.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% | 100% | −3.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 81% | 100% | −18.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 92% | 96% | −4.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 80% | 84% | −4.0 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 | #1/7 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test · 275/35 R18 |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A G Force Rival S 1.5
Pros
- Exceptional dry traction and lateral grip
- Rapid warm-up, making it ideal for short-duration autocross
- Superior tread life and durability compared to other 200TW competitors
Cons
- Performance degrades significantly in wet or cold conditions
- Tendency to overheat and lose grip ('grease up') during long track sessions
- Increased road noise and tendency to tramline on public roads
Tire B Potenza RE 71RS
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
- Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
- Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
- Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.
r/CarTrackDays
·2 upvotes ·2025-02-17
“Need heat cycle advice I recently got a screaming deal on some Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS for my daily driver. It usually doesn't see track time but I figured it would be fun to try it out for the cost. The tires were cheap because they had a 2021 production date. In the past to heat cycle a tire, I've just driven on the highway a couple of hours and let the tire sit for 24 hours. The hurdle is, It's winter and too cold to really make an impact. To add to that, I doubt I will have clean enough roads for that tire. My track does have winter lapping when it is clean and dry, but it still may be cold. Any suggestions on how to get a heat cycle on these tires in cold temperatures? Read more”
civicx.com
·2 upvotes ·2025-02-25
“I just put some Bridgestone Potenza Re71rs on my FC1 and holt shit these things kick ass. I took the same turn series before/after the tire change and the turn-in is ridiculous. Looking forward to hitting up some backroads and Lagun Seca for a trackday.”
s2ki.com
“Quote: Back to the RE71RS tires: 1. How loud is the tread noise? 2. How much gravel are they picking up in normal and back roads driving? Just replaced my 7 and 8 year old Bridgestone S04 tires (aged out). Less than 100 miles so far. I'm happy. 1. No increase in tread noise I can detect. Surprisingly quiet. My former RE-11As were a little noisey. The Dunlops were LOUD. 2. Twinkling of fine gravel is present under the car. Noticeable and expected. -- Chuck”
Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 7/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
74
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better dry, wet and handling. Where the BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 84 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 77 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 86 vs 74 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich G Force Rival S 1.5
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
G Force Rival S 1.5 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Which is better in the wet, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 77 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 84 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 60 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, G Force Rival S 1.5 or Potenza RE 71RS?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 58 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology