Tests – · none yet Owners 84 · 24 reviews
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 22 road tests and 24 + 1,629 owner reviews. How we score
SportContact 7 is ahead, 88–80
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 83 · 1,629 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
80
Dry
SportContact 7 +1797Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 100 Reviews found online 87 92 g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 86.5 = 80
SportContact 7: 60% × 99.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 97
No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
81
Wet
SportContact 7 +1495Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests ≈ 79 (est.) 96 Reviews found online 85 93 g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 78.6 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81
SportContact 7: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 93.3 = 95
No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Comfort
g-Force Profiler 2 +770Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 80 79 g-Force Profiler 2: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
SportContact 7: 40% × 55.8 + 60% × 78.8 = 70
No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison62Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests – 59 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) SportContact 7: 60% × 59.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62
No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
77
Treadwear
g-Force Profiler 2 +869Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 83 64 g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 77
SportContact 7: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63.9 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
84
Handling (owners)
SportContact 7 +791Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Reviews found online 84 91 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison72Why this score
Source g-Force Profiler 2 SportContact 7 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests – 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 80 | 88 |
| Dry | 80 | 97 |
| Wet | 81 | 95 |
| Comfort | 77 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 62 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 91 |
| Efficiency | – | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
g-Force Profiler 2
SportContact 7
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A g-Force Profiler 2
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
- High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
- Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.
Cons
- Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
- Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
- Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
Tire B SportContact 7
Pros
- Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
- Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
- Strong braking performance and high stability at speed
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
- Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
- Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental SportContact 7
The community generally regards the SportContact 7 as an excellent ultra-high-performance tire, praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering, quick warm-up, and good rim protection. Many rank it at or above the Michelin PS4S and ahead of the PS5 and Goodyear Asymmetric 6 for outright performance. The main criticisms are fast tread wear (often about 10–15k miles), low starting tread depth, softer sidewalls, some tramlining and noise, and poor durability on track.
“Had the same dilemma, went for PremiumContact 7 in the end for my Cupra ST300 4drive. Both have great traction when wet and dry, SC7 is more for an overall aggresive driving, while PC7 are bit more comfy, for a mix of sport and city daily cruising. Both are very quiet on the highway.”
“Not a C7 but Continental SportContact 7, similar or better than PilotSport 4S in most aspect but a bit noisier, wears faster too”
“I have Continental Sport Contact 7's on my S550 and the are better than the PS4S in my view (plus they stack up well in independent reviews as well)”
Based on 115 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 | B · Continental SportContact 7 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 123 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Continental SportContact 7
Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 80 on dry.
Continental SportContact 7 scores 95 vs 81 on wet.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 77 vs 69 on treadwear.
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 77 vs 70 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?
Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 95 vs 81 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?
Continental SportContact 7, 97 vs 80 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 77 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 77 vs 69 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology