BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 22 road tests and 24 + 1,629 owner reviews. How we score

SportContact 7 is ahead, 88–80

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental SportContact 7
± 4

Tests 84 · 22 tests Owners 83 · 1,629 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 18 in 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“On my 2nd set. Got decent mileage from them. 15k miles from the first set of rears and i've 11k on the 2nd set with 4.5mm still left on them.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    SportContact 7 +17
    97
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests≈ 76 (est.)100
    Reviews found online8792

    g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 75.6 (est.) + 40% × 86.5 = 80

    SportContact 7: 60% × 99.9 + 40% × 91.5 = 97

    No road tests of dry for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 81

    Wet

    SportContact 7 +14
    95
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests≈ 79 (est.)96
    Reviews found online8593

    g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 78.6 (est.) + 40% × 85.2 = 81

    SportContact 7: 60% × 95.5 + 40% × 93.3 = 95

    No road tests of wet for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Comfort

    g-Force Profiler 2 +7
    70
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 71 (est.)56
    Reviews found online8079

    g-Force Profiler 2: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    SportContact 7: 40% × 55.8 + 60% × 78.8 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests–59
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    SportContact 7: 60% × 59.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 62

    No owner ratings of noise for SportContact 7. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 77

    Treadwear

    g-Force Profiler 2 +8
    69
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 73 (est.)72
    Reviews found online8364

    g-Force Profiler 2: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 77

    SportContact 7: 60% × 72 + 40% × 63.9 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for g-Force Profiler 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 84

    Handling (owners)

    SportContact 7 +7
    91
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Reviews found online8491
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    Sourceg-Force Profiler 2SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests–72
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 vs Continental SportContact 7: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2Continental SportContact 7
Relative Score 80 88
Dry 80 97
Wet 81 95
Comfort 77 70
Noise – 62
Treadwear 77 69
Handling (owners) 84 91
Efficiency – 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

g-Force Profiler 2

± 4

SportContact 7

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A g-Force Profiler 2

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability compared to premium competitors.
  • High levels of confidence-inspiring grip in both wet and dry conditions.
  • Stiff sidewall design provides excellent cornering feedback and agility.

Cons

  • Some reports of increased road noise compared to quieter touring tires.
  • Requires a short warm-up period to reach optimal operating temperature for maximum grip.
  • Occasional reports of tracking or 'riding' road ridges due to high grip levels.
All owner themes in the g-Force Profiler 2 review

Tire B SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

The community generally regards the SportContact 7 as an excellent ultra-high-performance tire, praised for exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering, quick warm-up, and good rim protection. Many rank it at or above the Michelin PS4S and ahead of the PS5 and Goodyear Asymmetric 6 for outright performance. The main criticisms are fast tread wear (often about 10–15k miles), low starting tread depth, softer sidewalls, some tramlining and noise, and poor durability on track.

Top themes
#Exceptional grip#Fast tread wear#Comparison with PS4S#Wet performance#Track durability#Comfort and noise#Rim protection#PremiumContact 7 alternative

Based on 115 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 B · Continental SportContact 7
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—123
Rim diameters—18″ – 24″
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—240 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2

Continental SportContact 7

Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better dry, wet and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental SportContact 7 scores 97 vs 80 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental SportContact 7 scores 95 vs 81 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 77 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2 scores 77 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2
Tire B · Continental SportContact 7

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?

Which is better in the wet, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?

Continental SportContact 7, 95 vs 81 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?

Continental SportContact 7, 97 vs 80 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 77 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, g-Force Profiler 2 or SportContact 7?

BFGoodrich g-Force Profiler 2, 77 vs 69 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology