Head-to-head Updated

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Kumho Solus HA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 102 + 18 owner reviews. How we score

Solus HA31 leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus HA31
Tire BKumho

Solus HA31

All Season

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 77 · 18 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 10 in 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Trail-Terrain T/A +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 70 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7377

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71

    Solus HA31: 60% × 63.6 + 40% × 77.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Solus HA31 +14
    79
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)76
    Reviews found online6383

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    Solus HA31: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 83.3 = 79

    No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 77

    Snow

    Trail-Terrain T/A +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 74 (est.)66
    Reviews found online8280

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77

    Solus HA31: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 79.9 = 71

    No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Solus HA31 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6475

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65

    Solus HA31: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75.1 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Solus HA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    Solus HA31 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6973

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 67

    Solus HA31: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 72.7 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7572

    Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    Solus HA31: 60% × 71.8 + 40% × 71.8 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 64

    Handling (owners)

    Solus HA31 +14
    78
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Reviews found online6478
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    63
    Why this score
    SourceTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–63
Scores at a glance
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Kumho Solus HA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/AKumho Solus HA31
Relative Score 69 73
Dry 71 69
Wet 65 79
Snow 77 71
Comfort 65 73
Noise 67 72
Treadwear 72 72
Handling (owners) 64 78
Efficiency – 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Trail-Terrain T/A

± 7

Solus HA31

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryTrail-Terrain T/ASolus HA31ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 90% #12/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 88% #7/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 95% #7/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 81% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 94% #6/31 · 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview – Different tests
Snow Braking Snow 100% #1/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test 92% #6/10 · 2019 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #8/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test #9/31 2019 All Season Tyre Performance Overview – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A

Pros

  • Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
  • Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
  • Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
  • Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
  • Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
All owner themes in the Trail-Terrain T/A review

Tire B Solus HA31

Pros

  • Excellent snow and winter weather traction
  • Strong grip and stability on wet and dry roads
  • High value and competitive pricing compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Tires can feel slightly soft in warmer weather conditions
  • Mixed feedback regarding dry performance compared to dedicated summer options
All owner themes in the Solus HA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A B · Kumho Solus HA31
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5029
Rim diameters15″ – 22″13″ – 18″
Tread depth11 - 13/32″10/32″
UTQG660 A A - B420 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A

Kumho Solus HA31

Narrow edge: Kumho Solus HA31 — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 79 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 78 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus HA31 scores 73 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 77 vs 71 on snow.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Tire B · Kumho Solus HA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 79 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 77 vs 71 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 72 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

Kumho Solus HA31, 73 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or Solus HA31?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology