Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 102 reviews
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A vs Laufenn G Fit 4S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 6 road tests and 102 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
G Fit 4S is ahead, 75–69
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
G Fit 4S +172Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 73 81 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
G Fit 4S: 60% × 65.3 + 40% × 81.1 = 72
No road tests of dry for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
G Fit 4S +2085Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 63 85 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65
G Fit 4S: 60% × 85.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 85
No road tests of wet for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
77
Snow
Level77Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 74 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 82 77 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 74.2 (est.) + 40% × 82.2 = 77
G Fit 4S: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 77 = 77
No road tests of snow for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
G Fit 4S +1075Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 64 78 Trail-Terrain T/A: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
G Fit 4S: 40% × 71.6 + 60% × 78.1 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
Trail-Terrain T/A +2938Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 18 Reviews found online 69 ≈ 66 (est.) Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69 = 67
G Fit 4S: 60% × 18.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 38
No road tests of noise for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for G Fit 4S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
G Fit 4S +375Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 72 Reviews found online 75 79 Trail-Terrain T/A: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72
G Fit 4S: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 78.5 = 75
No road tests of treadwear for Trail-Terrain T/A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
G Fit 4S +1680Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Reviews found online 64 80 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison47Why this score
Source Trail-Terrain T/A G Fit 4S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests – 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 75 |
| Dry | 71 | 72 |
| Wet | 65 | 85 |
| Snow | 77 | 77 |
| Comfort | 65 | 75 |
| Noise | 67 | 38 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 75 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 80 |
| Efficiency | – | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Trail-Terrain T/A
G Fit 4S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Trail-Terrain T/A | G Fit 4S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 93% #9/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 65% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 87% #5/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 88% #7/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 98% #2/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 81% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 99% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 93% #8/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 99% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% #1/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 96% #3/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 100% #1/8 · 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | 93% #4/12 · 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #8/8 2025 ADAC All Terrain Tyre Test | #8/12 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV All Season Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Trail-Terrain T/A
Pros
- Low road noise for an all-terrain tire, with several reviewers calling it quieter than previous tires such as the AT3 and other all-terrains
- Strong snow and ice performance, including a Colorado snowstorm and multiple Alps trips with up to a foot of snow
- Comfortable, smooth ride and good handling and braking on the road
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction reported by several reviewers, including wheelspin, lack of confidence on wet roads and ABS activation issues
- Some reviewers found road noise high on paved surfaces, and one called it outrageously noisy, though others found it quiet
- Wear is faster for some owners, with one set nearing replacement after about 20,000 miles and two years
Tire B G Fit 4S
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance in wet conditions and heavy snow
- High value for money as an affordable budget tire with Hankook backing
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Slightly noticeable tread noise at higher speeds above 100 km/h
- Isolated quality control concerns regarding sidewall bumps on new tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A | B · Laufenn G Fit 4S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 50 | 79 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 13″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11 - 13/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 660 A A - B | 640 B A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 12 | 12 |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A
Laufenn G Fit 4S
Winner: Laufenn G Fit 4S — better wet, handling and comfort. Pick the BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A if noise matters most to you.
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A scores 67 vs 38 on noise.
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 85 vs 65 on wet.
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 80 vs 64 on handling.
Laufenn G Fit 4S scores 75 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
Which is better in the wet, Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 85 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 72 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 77 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain T/A, 67 vs 38 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Trail-Terrain T/A or G Fit 4S?
Laufenn G Fit 4S, 75 vs 72 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology